Results 1 to 10 of 12
Threaded View
-
01-14-2009, 08:57 PM #1Senior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- Joliet, Illinois, United States
- Posts
- 102
- Downloads
- 11
- Uploads
- 0
Why does Rule no longer use regency?
In 2ed, Rule Holding cost (x) regency and 1GB where x was = target holding value
Ruling from 0 to 1 costs no regency
-----
In the version presented at this website, the cost is 1gb.
-----
In the version used in RoE2 the cost is = (holding level)gb.
----
With some regents getting obscene amounts of regency, isn't this a good way to funnel some of that away?
Reply With QuoteThread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Rule Province
By The Jew in forum BRCS 3.0/3.5 EditionReplies: 9Last Post: 10-15-2004, 06:45 AM -
Domain Upkeep Rule
By dunsel in forum The Royal LibraryReplies: 3Last Post: 07-03-2004, 09:29 PM -
New Multi-Classing Rule.
By geeman in forum The Royal LibraryReplies: 62Last Post: 09-25-2002, 09:34 PM -
Contest and Rule Holding
By Magian in forum The Royal LibraryReplies: 36Last Post: 02-18-2002, 08:24 PM -
Do you enforce the maximum regency collection rule based on bloodline
By Lawgiver in forum The Royal LibraryReplies: 25Last Post: 01-16-2002, 03:43 AM
Tags for this Thread
3rd,
3rd edition,
action,
advantage,
blooded,
bloodline,
bloodline strength,
brcs,
campaign,
Cerilia,
character,
characters,
derivation,
description,
descriptions,
domain,
edition,
general,
heir,
holding,
holdings,
irdeggman,
land,
leader,
lore,
parity,
point,
regency,
result,
rule,
ruling,
strength,
test,
unblooded,
valid
Bookmarks