Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 34

Thread: Endier

  1. #1
    Site Moderator kgauck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Springfield Mo
    Posts
    3,562
    Downloads
    2
    Uploads
    0

    Endier

    Discussion thread for Endier. If you would like to add a comment, click the Post Reply button.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Mojczak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Montréal, Québec
    Posts
    104
    Downloads
    14
    Uploads
    0
    Is there any reason why the Macceln bloodline is listed as Masela, 18, instead of the Brenna 32 they were in secrets of endier?

  3. #3
    Site Moderator kgauck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Springfield Mo
    Posts
    3,562
    Downloads
    2
    Uploads
    0
    Endier was uploaded from another source. Is it possible the Maccelns listed are a cadet branch of those listed in the PS?

  4. #4
    Senior Member Mojczak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Montréal, Québec
    Posts
    104
    Downloads
    14
    Uploads
    0
    Nop. Miera is the same daughter of Gavin Macceln, she is even listed as F2 in the Sourcebook and with a major brenna of 36 (while her father and all other macceln, including her own sons, are brenna major 32). Would be hard. As the Macceln have been in endier for only as far as 60 year. Gavin being the First Endieran estalished macceln, as he hailed from talinie. All living canonic members of the macceln bloodline of endier are posted in the PS.

  5. #5
    Site Moderator kgauck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Springfield Mo
    Posts
    3,562
    Downloads
    2
    Uploads
    0
    Do bring them into line with the PS, if you consider it the best approach.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Mojczak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Montréal, Québec
    Posts
    104
    Downloads
    14
    Uploads
    0
    I have adapted the bloodline... even tho I question the changing of class. If we make the transition from 2nd edition to 3.5... well, I don't even get why they put her a fighter class in the first place, I would almost be inclined to think this as a typo... but in 3.5, I hardly see how she would be able to fare well in the criminal ring, to the level of a Macceln with a fighter's skills list. Maybe multiclass her...?

  7. #7
    Site Moderator kgauck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Springfield Mo
    Posts
    3,562
    Downloads
    2
    Uploads
    0
    It may be the case that whomever wrote the document used some of the characters in a campaign and adapted them thereto.

    Either multi-classing or just reverting to rogue. Rogues make good combatants unless pitted directly against fighters, and even then not until mid level.

  8. #8
    Senior Member Mojczak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Montréal, Québec
    Posts
    104
    Downloads
    14
    Uploads
    0
    Why aren't Guilder and Kalien both linked together to internal pages?

  9. #9
    Site Moderator kgauck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Springfield Mo
    Posts
    3,562
    Downloads
    2
    Uploads
    0
    I'm not sure what you're asking. There is a Kalien page, and a Guilder page, and while I see some examples where guilder isn't linked, Kalien certainly is. All that's on his page is a short paragraph, his portrait, and trademark.

  10. #10
    Senior Member Mojczak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Montréal, Québec
    Posts
    104
    Downloads
    14
    Uploads
    0
    Why it goes like: Guilder [[Kalien]], instead of [[Guilder Kalien]], which is the name if known for.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
BIRTHRIGHT, DUNGEONS & DRAGONS, D&D, the BIRTHRIGHT logo, and the D&D logo are trademarks owned by Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and are used by permission. ©2002-2010 Wizards of the Coast, Inc.