Results 1 to 10 of 10
Threaded View
-
05-03-2002, 11:05 PM #1
At 12:12 AM 5/4/2002 +0200, Carl Cramér wrote:
>There is also a base cost of the action, and you have to spend an action
>doing it. Then you have to convince people to show up, because there is
>always the risk of treachery. All in all, I find it works fine.
Do all regents participating in the action spend an action doing it?
Anyway, I generally like the concept, I`m just not sure the exchange rate
is practical in the long term, and it might be problematic in certain
(collective rule) campaign types because it could make them significantly
more versatile.
Also, does it cost RP to participate in a Party action? I ask because of
what might happen with non-regent scions. If someone can get RP from
spending GB and it doesn`t cost RP to participate then what might happen if
a few dozen minor nobles get involved in a Party action and create RP for
their personal use? They could spend these RP to improve their bloodline,
or they might be able to insure the success of various domain level
activities despite the fact that they are not themselves regents. It would
also give them access to more domain actions. If it costs just 1RP to
participate this problem goes away.
In any case, using an action that allows GB to be transferred into RP could
have serious repercussions at several levels of play. GB could effectively
be used to increase a character`s bloodline by spending a domain action to
raise RP. GB are generally easier to come by at the realm level for
certain regents (particularly guilders) and if they transfer at 1GB = 3.5RP
then a Party action performed by The Brecht Council of Guilders, for
example, could create quite a windfall of regency for those regents.
Gary
************************************************** **************************
The Birthright Homepage: http://www.birthright.net
To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@ORACLE.WIZARDS.COM
with UNSUB BIRTHRIGHT-L in the body of the message.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks