Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Forests

  1. #1
    Robertson
    Guest

    Forests

    - -----Original Message-----
    From: Brian Stoner
    To: birthright
    Date: Saturday, April 18, 1998 12:56 AM
    Subject: [BIRTHRIGHT] - Forests



    >(snip)
    >Along these lines, I have a question regarding undergrowth. Most of the
    forests
    >where I live (Western Oregon) are coniferous with thick undergrowth. I
    have
    >little experience traveling through any other forests and was wondering:
    What are
    >the forests like where you live? Example, Assuming the forests of the
    Rjurik
    >Highlands are fairly similar to those of Scandinavia, how thick would the
    >undergrowth there be...if there is any?
    >
    >Thickness of undergrowth can have obvious effects on a campaign. It is
    easier for
    >monsters (as well as the PCs) to hide. Travel is slowed the thicker the
    growth
    >is. Whereas, if there is no undergrowth, travel isn't slowed nearly as
    much and
    >there are fewer places to hide.
    >
    >Brian
    >
    I'm not sure what the forests in Scandinavia today are like, but I would
    guess most of the forests in areas like Rjurik are what we would call virgin
    boreal (ie., northern) forests. I live in the northeast US, where there
    aren't too many stretches of virgin forest. But I did have a chance to hike
    through a stretch of it last fall. While undergrowth probably isn't quite
    the term for it, there is a lot of ground clutter. Most of it consisted of
    fallen trees covered with inches-thick layers of moss.

    Other things which might effect the ground cover in forests include:

    1) Moisture. There will be more moss and water-loving shrubs in damp,
    coastal areas, while dryer northern forest might be more like the eastern
    side of the rockies (lots of sage, sparser trees, etc.)

    2) Geology. How was the terrain formed? If there was ever an ice age, with
    glaciers moving across the area, you can expect lots of boulders and such.
    The glaciers may also dump a lot of nutrient-rich soil as they retreat,
    creating fertile ground for those ground shrubs. I would expect Rjurik has
    probably seen its share of glacial activity.

    3) Human presence. Naturally. Most forests here in the northeast have fairly
    open forest floor, since we've been scouring them for a couple hundred
    years. But a place like Tuarhievel, or northern Rjurik or Vos, might never
    have any floor clearance other than forest fires. Even then, the fire may
    leave decaying tree trunks, from larger trees that didn't burn through, and
    other debris.

    In general, I would expect most forests in BR, with the possible exception
    of southern Anuire, to be a lot denser than most places in the US.

    Sorry to write a small novel for my first post, but the question piqued my
    interest. Hope I helped answer your question.

    Jamie

  2. #2
    Brian Stoner
    Guest

    Forests

    > The Domain of Vorostokov is featured in the $9.95 (U.S.) Ravenloft module
    > "Dark of the Moon" and is described as a vast domain more than 300 miles
    > across consisting of icy plains and coniferous (whatever that means) forests
    > with many small lakes and rivers scattered about.

    Just a side note: A coniferous forest is a forest of pines, firs and other trees
    with needles, as opposed to a deciduous (sp?) forest, which would have broad
    leaves. The forests of the Rjurik Highlands and Vosgaard would be Coniferous
    (player Dave responds, "Carnivorous! I'm gonna attack with my Hackmaster
    +12!!"). Most of the forests to the South, in Anuire and Khinasi, would be
    deciduous (sp again?).

    Along these lines, I have a question regarding undergrowth. Most of the forests
    where I live (Western Oregon) are coniferous with thick undergrowth. I have
    little experience traveling through any other forests and was wondering: What are
    the forests like where you live? Example, Assuming the forests of the Rjurik
    Highlands are fairly similar to those of Scandinavia, how thick would the
    undergrowth there be...if there is any?

    Thickness of undergrowth can have obvious effects on a campaign. It is easier for
    monsters (as well as the PCs) to hide. Travel is slowed the thicker the growth
    is. Whereas, if there is no undergrowth, travel isn't slowed nearly as much and
    there are fewer places to hide.

    Brian

  3. #3
    The Olesen`s
    Guest

    Forests

    Brian Stoner wrote:
    >
    > > The Domain of Vorostokov is featured in the $9.95 (U.S.) Ravenloft module
    > > "Dark of the Moon" and is described as a vast domain more than 300 miles
    > > across consisting of icy plains and coniferous (whatever that means) forests
    > > with many small lakes and rivers scattered about.
    >
    > Just a side note: A coniferous forest is a forest of pines, firs and other trees
    > with needles, as opposed to a deciduous (sp?) forest, which would have broad
    > leaves. The forests of the Rjurik Highlands and Vosgaard would be Coniferous
    > (player Dave responds, "Carnivorous! I'm gonna attack with my Hackmaster
    > +12!!"). Most of the forests to the South, in Anuire and Khinasi, would be
    > deciduous (sp again?).
    >
    > Along these lines, I have a question regarding undergrowth. Most of the forests
    > where I live (Western Oregon) are coniferous with thick undergrowth. I have
    > little experience traveling through any other forests and was wondering: What are
    > the forests like where you live? Example, Assuming the forests of the Rjurik
    > Highlands are fairly similar to those of Scandinavia, how thick would the
    > undergrowth there be...if there is any?


    I visited Norway last year and took a hike up a mountian to swim in the
    coldest pond on Earth. Anyway....
    The trees were mostly pines and the ground was mainly coved with pine
    needles, fallen trees, and thats about it. Howvever there was an
    occational small bush type plant.

    THis was on a mountian with a lake on top.

    If you care, the lake fed the pond we went swimming in although I think
    only the cold water went into the pond.
    Still quite fun.

  4. #4
    Trizt
    Guest

    Forests

    On 18-Apr-98, Brian Stoner (bstoner@efn.org) wrote about [BIRTHRIGHT] -
    Forests:

    - ->Along these lines, I have a question regarding undergrowth. Most of the
    - ->forests
    - ->where I live (Western Oregon) are coniferous with thick undergrowth. I have
    - ->little experience traveling through any other forests and was wondering:
    What
    - ->are
    - ->the forests like where you live? Example, Assuming the forests of the
    Rjurik
    - ->Highlands are fairly similar to those of Scandinavia, how thick would the
    - ->undergrowth there be...if there is any?
    - ->Thickness of undergrowth can have obvious effects on a campaign. It is
    easier
    - ->for monsters (as well as the PCs) to hide. Travel is slowed the thicker the
    - ->growth
    - ->is. Whereas, if there is no undergrowth, travel isn't slowed nearly as much
    - ->and there are fewer places to hide.

    Pine forests don't have much of undergrowth, as it's to dark on the gruond for
    most types of vegitation. The ground is quite dry in the pine forest too and
    under a pine tree it's a really good place to sleep as it's somwhat warmer and
    you are quite well protected from rain and wind. The pinetree roots grows near
    the surface and sometimes they even come up a bit, which makes it hard to
    trawel here (easy to stumble on a root when you are a bit tired).
    Another form of forests which is common in scandinavia is the mixed forest
    (pine and leaftrees), here is alot more vegitation on the ground and it's a
    bit more wet on the ground. No problems to find hiding places in the
    vegitation, but you will not be as protected against wind and rain as under a
    pine tree. It's quite hard to move silently during the "green" period, as you
    don't see the old dry branches under the grass and undervegitation.
    Most of the forests around here are of mixed nature, but the more to the north
    you come, they generally have more and more pine trees.

    It's genrally easier to move in a mixed forest than in a pine, as in the
    pineforest the trees are much closer to each other, and this affects the range
    you can see.

    //Trizt of Ward^RITE

    -

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Old Father of the Forests
    By Sorontar in forum Main
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-30-2009, 12:09 AM
  2. Domain:Old Father of the Forests
    By Sorontar in forum Category
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-23-2008, 03:01 AM
  3. Cerilian Forests
    By the Silver Prince in forum A Bards Tale
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-06-2005, 09:07 PM
  4. Elves and Forests/Sources.
    By geeman in forum The Royal Library
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 10-13-2003, 08:51 PM
  5. [BIRTHRIGHT] Elves and Forests/Sources.
    By ryancaveney in forum The Royal Library
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-29-2003, 10:55 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
BIRTHRIGHT, DUNGEONS & DRAGONS, D&D, the BIRTHRIGHT logo, and the D&D logo are trademarks owned by Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and are used by permission. ©2002-2010 Wizards of the Coast, Inc.