Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13
  1. #11
    Site Moderator Ariadne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    near Frankfurt/ Germany
    Posts
    801
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Originally posted by Athos69@Jul 2 2004, 09:13 AM
    Should we allow characters with a Great bloodline to achieve levels higher than 20?* Shall we allow it to bloodlines of Major status?* Should we open it up to anyone with a Bloodline?
    I'm of the opinion, that there's no problem not to open it for anyone (even non-blooded). Since you need XP to gain levels and you normally gain XP thought adventuring (or good rulership), it is normal that only "exceptional" characters will ever gain epic levels. Those exeptional characters are normally blooded, but I don't see a reason to restrict them by bloodline. If a "normal" unblooded Expert 20 slays a dragon (or whatever) and his XP would push im to Epic levels, tell me why he could not get 21st level? Well, normally an Expert would never get the idea to go adventuring, but so what? If he does, he IS exceptional...
    May Khirdai always bless your sword and his lightning struck your enemies!

  2. #12
    Site Moderator geeman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    California, USA
    Posts
    2,165
    Downloads
    4
    Uploads
    0
    tcharazazel writes:



    > I agree definately up the the DM.



    Since things are always ultimately up to the DM, I suppose the question here

    is whether or not this situation is one of those things that really needs

    some additional prose in the BRCS. In the same way that, say, the

    Leadership feat has text that describes how the DM might not want to allow

    it since it changes the nature of the campaign, does the epic level require

    something similar for the BRCS?



    Personally, I`m inclined to leave it alone unless there is some sort of

    campaign-specific thing that makes sense to include. Basing access to the

    epic level doesn`t strike me as being particularly thematic, for instance,

    so I don`t think that`s enough to warrent inclusion in the update.



    Gary

  3. #13
    Personally, I`m inclined to leave it alone unless there is some sort of
    campaign-specific thing that makes sense to include. Basing access to the
    epic level doesn`t strike me as being particularly thematic, for instance,
    so I don`t think that`s enough to warrent inclusion in the update.
    Aye, heheh, that's all i meant. It doesnt need to be in the rewrite of the BRCS.
    "Who was the first that forged the deadly blade? Of rugged steel his savage soul was made." --Tibullus

    "Qui desiderat pacem praeparet bellum." --Vegetius

    "Men grow tired of sleep, love, singing and dancing sooner than war." --Homer

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
BIRTHRIGHT, DUNGEONS & DRAGONS, D&D, the BIRTHRIGHT logo, and the D&D logo are trademarks owned by Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and are used by permission. ©2002-2010 Wizards of the Coast, Inc.