Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Ehrshegh of Spelling Thelandrin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,084
    Downloads
    64
    Uploads
    0

    Anuirean emperors (version by: FearlessLeader)

    Discussion thread for User:FearlessLeader/Anuirean emperors.

    The first Emperor Hadrian doesn't seem to bear any numeral at all, whereas Michael Roele's father is listed as Hadrian IV, without there seemingly have been a Hadrian III. I assume that this must be in error.

  2. #2
    Site Moderator AndrewTall's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Chelmsford, Essex, England
    Posts
    2,305
    Downloads
    25
    Uploads
    0
    I expect that either it is a typo, or Hadrien 3 also had another name and number - I would be amazed if the progression was always logical...

  3. #3
    Member SirRobin's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Counciltucky
    Posts
    35
    Downloads
    9
    Uploads
    0
    I imagine that there are some historical precedents for this. Maybe a famous Hadrian who was considered the "Third" without ever formally wearing the crown?
    Sir Robin the Not-quite-so-brave-as-Sir-Lancelot,
    who had nearly fought the Dragon of Agnor,
    who had nearly stood up to the vicious Chicken of Bristol,
    and who had personally wet himself at the Battle of Badon Hill.

  4. #4
    Site Moderator kgauck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Springfield Mo
    Posts
    3,562
    Downloads
    2
    Uploads
    0
    In historical cases there are people who get numbers after the fact who never held the crown because they were legitimate. Louis 17 never technically existed, Young Louis was killed while a boy, as yet uncrowned, during the French Revolution. His father was Louis 16, his uncle Louis 18. There are other reasons legitimate people get passed over. Especially when an uncle usurps the throne, but the rightful line later re-asserts control.

    Another case is the very brief reign, especially when technically uncrowned. Old king dies, new king dies before coronation. Stuff like that.

    Its also possible that Hadrian III was himself a usurper, so while he called himself that, later generations regard someone else as the legitimate Emperor and the next Emperor named Hadrian doesn't want to be called III because H3 was rightly hated. So they jump from 2 to 4.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Anuirean
    By Arjan in forum BRWiki Discussions
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-11-2008, 10:20 AM
  2. O Anuirean!
    By teloft in forum A Bards Tale
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-27-2004, 05:22 AM
  3. Roll Of Emperors
    By Archduke_of_Diemed in forum The Royal Library
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 10-23-2003, 08:06 AM
  4. Emperors' list
    By Khutulus in forum The Royal Library
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-11-2002, 02:40 PM
  5. O Anuirean!
    By in forum The Royal Library
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-01-1970, 12:00 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
BIRTHRIGHT, DUNGEONS & DRAGONS, D&D, the BIRTHRIGHT logo, and the D&D logo are trademarks owned by Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and are used by permission. ©2002-2010 Wizards of the Coast, Inc.