Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: [birthright]

  1. #1
    tbeutler@sprynet.co
    Guest

    [birthright]

    When a regent's provinces are occupied by an enemy, the enemy
    pays 1 GB per province occupied, does the regent still base his domain
    maintenance on the total number of provinces (the regent has not yet
    been divested) and holdings (which may be reduced to zero)?


    As for pillaging, if a castle is neutralized, can the troops
    that are "besieging"/neutralizing the castle be counted as those troops
    available to pillage? It would seem that they shouldn't. They have
    their duty. If they leave the seige then the troops in the castle
    could ride out and rout the scattered looters and pillagers.


    Also, with sea raids, doesn't it defeat the purpose of having
    sea raiders (irregulars from ships --the Rjurik ...) declare war to
    raid a "shore" province? The raid should be a lightning attack,
    possibly limited to pillaging at moderate (to signify the haste with
    which they conduct the raid). This may be a more realistic approach to
    such actions. It places regents in fear of protecting their shores
    from the fleets of raiders and expands the sea dimension of the game.

    Can a regent establish trade routes with a vassal (within the
    general guidelines for creating trade routes)? The vassal does, after
    all, maintain an "independent" realm, albeit with tribute to the
    liegelord. I cann't imagine the Anuirean Empire having no internal
    trade routes and only trade routes to the unconquered lands.

  2. #2
    MHahn59022@aol.co
    Guest

    [birthright]

    In a message dated 97-08-23 06:42:52 EDT, you write:

  3. #3
    tbeutler@sprynet.co
    Guest

    [birthright]

    Does anyone allow create holding to be used as a realm action ?

    i.e. the ruler wishes to establish a royal guild in his/her realm (roll
    for each province) and issues edicts to his "minions", same for law and
    temple ...
    a province ruler could do so, but others would still have to do it a
    province at a time ...

  4. #4
    Site Moderator geeman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    California, USA
    Posts
    2,178
    Downloads
    4
    Uploads
    7

    [birthright]

    This link was sent to the Darkmatter list, but these things could be
    used as BR artifacts. In particular, they seem apt as the SW
    equivalent of mebhaighl stones, sielshegh gems, Lluabraight`s Gems of
    Arborea (there are 13 of these skulls--which might be a nice twist on
    the 12 gems) or even pre-Deismaar artifacts of the Lost that have a
    pre-RP function under Azrai that would be similar to those items. In
    any case, they just look cool....

    http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/americas/05/11/mexico.crystal.skull.ap/index.html

    Gary

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
BIRTHRIGHT, DUNGEONS & DRAGONS, D&D, the BIRTHRIGHT logo, and the D&D logo are trademarks owned by Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and are used by permission. ©2002-2010 Wizards of the Coast, Inc.