Hey all,

I've been following the threads about guilder regents getting so much money,
etc, and a thought has struck me. I've always been of the opinion that
fighter (not ranger, paladin) regents are at a disadvantage compared to
other character classes. For example, thief regents, or guilders, tend to
make much more money; Priest regents get a lot more regency from various
sources, and have a 'higher power' on which to blame things; etc.

OK, now I do realise that fighter regents tend to be domain rulers for the
most part, which does come with a lot of power in it's own right (see the
current guilder vs. province ruler thread), BUT....

what I was wondering is two things:

* Firstly, what is your take on the above? do you agree with me that
fighters seem at a disadvantage, or not?

* and secondly, has anyone got any ideas of how to address this [perceived?]
imbalance?

Cheers all,

Simon

--------
Simon Graindorge
Tribology Laboratory
Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering
University of Western Australia

email: simong@mech.uwa.edu.au
phone: +(61 8) 9380 3604
fax: +(61 8) 9380 1024
--------