Gary V. Foss wrote:

> That's an interesting way of handling it. I'd opt for a slower rate, though.
> Table 12: Blood Ability Acquisition seems to be designed to correspond with Table
> 10: Bloodline Strength, so the gaps are sometimes small--particularly at the lower
> end of the scale--to accomodate lower bloodline strength scores. 15 points seems
> to be about the average gap. How does 20 points sound? A new ability at 100,
> another at 120, etc.

This is what I would do, although I would not give as a higher chance of
getting a blood ability as the 80-100 range. Possibly instead use
something like this.
100-120 01-40 None
41-60 Minor
61-80 Major
81-99 Great

and so on


- --
Ian Hoskins

e-Mail: hoss@box.net.au
Homepage: http://darkstar.cyberserv.com
ICQ: 2938300