Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15
  1. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Malden, MA
    Posts
    761
    Downloads
    2
    Uploads
    0
    On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Athos69 wrote:



    > This is where having a non-linear population to province level falls

    > apart, but otherwise it is an excellent way to determine population.



    I don`t so much mind the nonlinearity; what I think this shows is the

    danger of the idea of splitting provinces. AFAICT, it exists only as an

    attempt to explain the origin of the Imperial City province. I am not

    convinced of the need for such a rule; I am fairly content to say "at the

    continent-spanning height of the Anuirean empire, a one-time-only

    exception was made." The biggest problem with introducing an explict rule

    to explain the IC is the slippery slope to allowing players to use it

    themselves in every domain, which strikes me as disastrous.



    The other reason I think splitting provinces is a bad idea is that one

    major function of the division of the map into provinces is the regulation

    of military movement. If you cut a province in two, you also double the

    amount of time it takes an army to march across the same old distance!

    Even worse, the speed change happens only in some directions: e.g., E-W

    but not N-S! This is a truly horrible thing to do to the military part of

    the game. Ideally, all provinces would either be identically sized in all

    dimensions, or have different movement costs per province per compass

    direction; both of these are quite challenging. A two-scale approach,

    such as Kenneth`s method of chopping provinces up into 30-50 6-mile hexes

    is pretty much the only way to maintain both variation in province shape

    and sanity in movement rules.



    This is why, in the D&D Companion Set, all "provinces" were defined

    precisely as individual hexagons on the world map.





    Ryan Caveney

  2. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Malden, MA
    Posts
    761
    Downloads
    2
    Uploads
    0
    On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Raesene Andu wrote:



    > Quite simply the question is should all elven forest province be

    > changed to */9 provinces.



    Absolutely yes, without any reservation. This is the very first change I

    ever made to BR back when I first bought it -- the many cases in which the

    source potential is listed as (9 - Province Level) are to me obviously an

    error in applying the rules. All elven provinces are */9, yes definitely.





    Ryan Caveney

  3. #13
    Senior Member Osprey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    1,478
    Downloads
    47
    Uploads
    8
    On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Raesene Andu wrote:

    > Quite simply the question is should all elven forest province be
    > changed to */9 provinces.

    Absolutely yes, without any reservation. This is the very first change I
    ever made to BR back when I first bought it -- the many cases in which the
    source potential is listed as (9 - Province Level) are to me obviously an
    error in applying the rules. All elven provinces are */9, yes definitely.


    Ryan Caveney
    I think PURE elven forests have a 9 source rating. However, I see many of them slowly being tainted on the borders with developed lands, and a resultant drop in source rating taking place, especially where roads have been built through the forests, but also on borders with any developed lands (say, -1 source bordering a province of level 3-5, -2 next to a 6+ province).

    Yet another reason to resent the humans...they really are everywhere, aren't they?

    -Osprey

  4. #14
    Birthright Developer Raesene Andu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    South Australia
    Posts
    1,357
    Downloads
    1
    Uploads
    0
    On the whole source potential thingy, I was thinking of changing the way it is calculated (mainly to bring some order to the whole thing).

    Basically my idea was that there were three underlying terrain types
    5 - Plains/Hills
    7 - Mountains
    9 - High Mountains

    And on to these basic types you applied a series of modifiers based on additional terrain features, like so.
    Forest +2 (lowland, hills, mountains only)
    Elven Influence +2
    River +1 (if river flows through province, not just runs along its border)
    Swamp +3 (lowland only)
    Glacier +1 to +3
    Dragon Bones +1
    Coral Reef +3
    And so on.
    Let me claim your Birthright!!

  5. #15
    Senior Member Osprey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    1,478
    Downloads
    47
    Uploads
    8
    I'd suggest adding a set of matching guidelines for things that decrease a source potential. Province levels and deforestation are the default ways, of course, but one could imagine magic-draining events in a province's history also dropping the source potential. Extensive mining and quarrying in hills and mountains might do that, as well as rifts into the Shadow World (where the SW source is leeching off the mebhaighal) or other corrupting magics. I reckon we could come up with a good list of ideas with some collective brainstorming.

    -Osprey

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
BIRTHRIGHT, DUNGEONS & DRAGONS, D&D, the BIRTHRIGHT logo, and the D&D logo are trademarks owned by Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and are used by permission. ©2002-2010 Wizards of the Coast, Inc.