Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 14 of 14
  1. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    144
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    yes, the idea is that the soldiers spend a month stomping around in the mage's flowers :P

  2. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    474
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    On Thu, 2002-06-27 at 18:40, Carl Cram=?ISO-8859-1?B?6Q==?=r wrote:

    Not exactly right either. For each turn of occupation, you can either raze
    all unfortified law, guild and temple holdings, or you can reduce one source
    holding by one level. So source holdings are not exactly immune, they are
    just very tough.

    Yes, quite so Carl - well said.


    /Carl

    Peter Lubke <peterlubke@OPTUSNET.COM.AU> wrote at 02-06-27 04.11:

    > On Thu, 2002-06-27 at 11:39, brnetboard@TUARHIEVEL.ORG wrote:
    >
    > Lord Eldred wrote:
    > One clarification on what Lubke said. I was under the impression that
    > occupation can and does effect sources. Don`t they? Why or why not?
    >
    > They don`t. It`s mentioned in the standard rulebook and explained
    > further in the BoM. Essentially, source holdings are inherently hidden.
    > When you think about it, of course they are. Temples, law and guilds are
    > for the most part out in the open - lots of persons must know about them
    > for them to function. A source need only (and should only) be known to
    > one person - the wizard regent.
    >
    > However if the occupying regent knew the exact location of the source
    > then he could occupy that.
    >
    >

    ************************************************** **************************
    The Birthright Homepage: http://www.birthright.net
    To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@ORACLE.WIZARDS.COM
    with UNSUB BIRTHRIGHT-L in the body of the message.

    ************************************************** **************************
    The Birthright Homepage: http://www.birthright.net
    To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@ORACLE.WIZARDS.COM
    with UNSUB BIRTHRIGHT-L in the body of the message.

  3. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    United Provinces of Ceril
    Posts
    1,028
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Couldn't occupation also help a source owner by reducing the province level thereby giving the source owner the ability to raise their source?
    Lord Eldred
    High Councilor of the
    United Provinces of Cerilia
    &quot;May Haelyn bring justice to your realm&quot;

  4. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    144
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    The maximum source potential of the land is not restored automatically when the population drops, cos the buildings and all that stuff would still be there. I think the rule is that the source raises by one for every year, in a province where it has the room to grow. This room to grow would be following the rules regarding source levels in populated lands.

    Eg if the land is an ancient forest it has a source potential maximum of nine, when there are no humans in the province. If N is the province level and M is the current source maximum level, then M+N<=9 If the province is occupied by elves, then obviously M+N<=18, since the sources do not drop when the province is occupied by elves :)

    I hope I was clear enough

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
BIRTHRIGHT, DUNGEONS & DRAGONS, D&D, the BIRTHRIGHT logo, and the D&D logo are trademarks owned by Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and are used by permission. ©2002-2010 Wizards of the Coast, Inc.