Results 1 to 3 of 3
Thread: Awnsheghlien and Ersheghlien.
-
05-20-2002, 06:17 PM #1
You know, something just occurred to me and I wonder what you guys think
about it.
There`s been some debate about how awnsheghlien and ersheghlien should be
represented in BR when translated the system into 3e. Some people like
using templates, while others like the idea of a prestige class. Why not
both? More accurately, why not make awnsheghlien a template and
ersheghlien a prestige class? That way the transformation of awnsheghlien
is automatic and uncontrollable from the POV of the character (which is how
it is described in the 2e BR materials) while the transformation of
ersheghlien is voluntary (ditto.)
It does kind of make the awnsheghlien more powerful, since they needn`t
spend character levels to gain access to their blood abilities, but I think
that might actually be sensible, given the nature of Azrai`s corruption and
all.
Does that sound sensible or is it the REM deprivation and caffeine talking?
Gary
************************************************** **************************
The Birthright Homepage: http://www.birthright.net
To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@ORACLE.WIZARDS.COM
with UNSUB BIRTHRIGHT-L in the body of the message.
-
05-20-2002, 09:47 PM #2
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
- Location
- Columbus, Ohio, United States
- Posts
- 440
- Downloads
- 20
- Uploads
- 0
In a message dated 5/20/02 2:04:33 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
geeman@SOFTHOME.NET writes:
<< There`s been some debate about how awnsheghlien and ersheghlien should be
represented in BR when translated the system into 3e. Some people like
using templates, while others like the idea of a prestige class. Why not
both? More accurately, why not make awnsheghlien a template and
ersheghlien a prestige class? That way the transformation of awnsheghlien
is automatic and uncontrollable from the POV of the character (which is how
it is described in the 2e BR materials) while the transformation of
ersheghlien is voluntary (ditto.) >>
I had not thought about it yet, but that sounds reasonable, IMO.
Lee.
************************************************** **************************
The Birthright Homepage: http://www.birthright.net
To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@ORACLE.WIZARDS.COM
with UNSUB BIRTHRIGHT-L in the body of the message.
-
05-21-2002, 07:51 AM #3
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Location
- Belgrade, Serbia
- Posts
- 152
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
>You know, something just occurred to me and I wonder what you guys
think
>about it.
>There`s been some debate about how awnsheghlien and ersheghlien should
be
>represented in BR when translated the system into 3e. Some people like
>using templates, while others like the idea of a prestige class. Why
not
>both? More accurately, why not make awnsheghlien a template and
>ersheghlien a prestige class? That way the transformation of
awnsheghlien
>is automatic and uncontrollable from the POV of the character (which is
how
>it is described in the 2e BR materials) while the transformation of
>ersheghlien is voluntary (ditto.)
>It does kind of make the awnsheghlien more powerful, since they needn`t
>spend character levels to gain access to their blood abilities, but I
think
>that might actually be sensible, given the nature of Azrai`s corruption
and
>all.
>Does that sound sensible or is it the REM deprivation and caffeine
talking?
It`s OK, if you give greater adventages to Ehrshegh and some
disadventages to Awnshegh. It would be a good idea to give Awnsheghlien
adventages which depend on character level. That way, both would have to
actually avance in level to gain those adventages.
************************************************** **************************
The Birthright Homepage: http://www.birthright.net
To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@ORACLE.WIZARDS.COM
with UNSUB BIRTHRIGHT-L in the body of the message.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks