Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Site Moderator Sorontar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    3,942
    Downloads
    23
    Uploads
    1

    Category:Game Mechanics

    Discussion thread for Category:Game Mechanics. If you would like to add a comment, click the Post Reply button.

  2. #2
    Site Moderator Sorontar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    3,942
    Downloads
    23
    Uploads
    1
    I have been refining the descriptions for a few categories based on what has been placed in them, and moving some things around.

    • Category:Glossary - terms used on Cerilia by characters
    • Category:Game Terms - terms used by rulebooks and players


    However, Category:Game Mechanics has a description that seems to have been lifted from the BRCS intro. As such, it is meaningless and I want to just cut it down to defining what should go in the category (as is the norm for most BRwiki category descriptions).

    My problem is defining what is in Game Mechanics that makes it distinct from Game Terms. Should Terms be a subcategory of Mechanics and no articles be in both? Should Terms be removed entirely and all its members shifted to Mechanics? If so, could Mechanics then be a subcategory of Glossary (which Terms presently is)?

    And should I start up a Category: Wiki Terms for terms relating to the wiki, e.g. policies, Birmail, stub, spam etc? Should these things be placed in a different category? Should they just be left with Game Terms?

    Sorontar

  3. #3
    Site Moderator kgauck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Springfield Mo
    Posts
    3,562
    Downloads
    2
    Uploads
    0
    I would say crunch goes in Game Mechanics, while game terms is for words we might take for granted, or are important in other respects, but would not be something we could take for granted.

    We should probably have a separate wiki terms category. We could also do with more and some re-written style pages.

  4. #4
    Site Moderator Sorontar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    3,942
    Downloads
    23
    Uploads
    1
    A some good example articles are "bloodline" and "regency".

    Both are terms that would be used by Cerilians, so they should be in Glossary.
    Both are very important to running Birthright games, so perhaps they should be in Game Mechanics.

    But neither are "technical terms" due to their usage on Cerilia, so they don't belong Game Terms. And neither article gives strict rules or "mechanics" so perhaps they shouldn't be in Game Mechanics.

    In contrast, "bloodline score" and "regency point" are not terms that used by Cerilians, so they should not be in Glossary.
    They are technical terms, so they should be in Game Terms.
    They are vital to running Birthright games, so they should be in Game Mechanics.

    Of course, it doesn't help that "regency" presently redirects to "regency point"

    But I hope this indicates where my confusion is. I am having trouble working out what the definitions of the categories should be and how they should relate to each other, if at all.

    Sorontar.

  5. #5
    Site Moderator kgauck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Springfield Mo
    Posts
    3,562
    Downloads
    2
    Uploads
    0
    I think both terms, "bloodline" and "regency" are technical terms, because they are necessary to understand to build characters and manage domains. Agreed that BP and RP are more crunchy and certainly also mechanical.

    If B and R are in glossary and terms, and BP and RP are in terms and mechanics, I think we're in good shape.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Hidden game mechanics? = increased realism ?
    By Noquar in forum The Royal Library
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 01-07-2009, 11:00 PM
  2. Taelinri -- The Game Mechanics
    By geeman in forum The Royal Library
    Replies: 106
    Last Post: 03-07-2008, 06:09 PM
  3. mechanics vs. narration
    By anacreon in forum The Royal Library
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 08-15-2004, 07:32 AM
  4. Flavour Vs. Game-mechanics
    By RaspK_FOG in forum BRCS 3.0/3.5 Edition
    Replies: 101
    Last Post: 02-06-2004, 03:50 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
BIRTHRIGHT, DUNGEONS & DRAGONS, D&D, the BIRTHRIGHT logo, and the D&D logo are trademarks owned by Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and are used by permission. ©2002-2010 Wizards of the Coast, Inc.