At 10:47 PM 4/23/2002 +1000, Peter Lubke wrote:

>Kenneth Gauck wrote:
>
>>I`m not familiar with the stablize action.
>
>(assuming you are being sarcastic here or are you punning me on spelling?)
>
>You have read the BR rulebook at least once haven`t you? The part about
>domain actions, in particular Agitate? (sarcasm)
>"A regent with a holding can use his influence to agitate or stabilize ...."
>
>Would it be better if I`d said "agitate for" and "agitate against" ? Was
>that too hard for you ?

Actually, the book uses different terms to describe an "agitate for"
Agitate action. Under "Loyalty" on p36 it uses the term "friendly
manipulation" which has a kind of stark, Orwellian horror if you really
consider it. It does use the word "stabilize" once in the Agitate action
description, but there is no "stabilize action" and I didn`t know what you
meant either, I`m afraid. Mr. Gauck responded before I did.

Gary

************************************************** **************************
The Birthright Homepage: http://www.birthright.net
To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@ORACLE.WIZARDS.COM
with UNSUB BIRTHRIGHT-L in the body of the message.