Results 1 to 10 of 10
Thread: Holding/Province Income Formula
Threaded View
-
11-25-2008, 01:34 PM #1
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- Joliet, Illinois, United States
- Posts
- 102
- Downloads
- 11
- Uploads
- 0
Holding/Province Income Formula
So, do we like .66 X Holding Level/1 X Province Level still?
I don't personally.
I prefer Holding Level X Province Level /6 and Province Level X Province Level /5
Some effects of doing it this way (and I think RoE does something similiar, although I haven't looked at the formulas) include smaller holdings (which are already more vulnerable) being less valuable, larger holdings being much more valuable, "backwater" countries like Aerenewe and Dhoesone being weaker compared to more established countries like Diemed, Elinie.
Anyone care to discuss the merits of either position?
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Holding attack/defense Holding system
By bbeau22 in forum BRCS 4th EditionReplies: 62Last Post: 08-28-2008, 12:49 PM -
[Branching from the Econ thread] Thoughts on the province holding for house rules
By Gwrthefyr in forum The Royal LibraryReplies: 3Last Post: 07-11-2007, 04:08 AM -
Income Levels
By Crossfell in forum The Royal LibraryReplies: 7Last Post: 04-10-2005, 04:41 AM -
Province levels and income?
By Angelbialaska in forum BRCS 3.0/3.5 EditionReplies: 28Last Post: 01-24-2005, 04:37 AM -
Fortified province or holding
By Arjan in forum The Royal LibraryReplies: 6Last Post: 03-18-2003, 03:16 PM
Bookmarks