Results 1 to 10 of 19

Threaded View

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    43
    Downloads
    44
    Uploads
    0

    100 Pages of New Rules Needed

    I see what went wrong. TO much details.
    Developers of BRCS 3.5 where on right track after death of project all went wrong.

    Hmmmm should elven horse have DEX 15 of 17 ...
    I think Think Muden have soft U

    I don't know maybe i am just mad there is nothing new for Br and 4e rotten and they are printing FR for 7th time.

    maybe we should make some 100 pages of basic rules that all stick to that + wiki. right now every player of BR have its on system and rule.
    Last edited by Thelandrin; 09-29-2008 at 04:50 PM. Reason: Bad language is unnecessary.
    Vosgaard's Veliki hrast.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Should the BRCS 3e wiki pages be editable?
    By Vicente in forum BRWiki Discussions
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 07-11-2008, 07:42 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
BIRTHRIGHT, DUNGEONS & DRAGONS, D&D, the BIRTHRIGHT logo, and the D&D logo are trademarks owned by Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and are used by permission. ©2002-2010 Wizards of the Coast, Inc.