Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Guilder

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Site Moderator kgauck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Springfield Mo
    Posts
    3,562
    Downloads
    2
    Uploads
    0

    Guilder

    Discussion thread for Guilder. If you would like to add a comment, click the Post Reply button.

  2. #2
    Site Moderator kgauck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Springfield Mo
    Posts
    3,562
    Downloads
    2
    Uploads
    0
    I propose that the page "Guilder" be a disambiguation page directing readers to the class information either individually or as "Guilder (class)" and another page listed as Guilder (rank) discussing the role of the leaders of guilds.

    I'm presuming that at some point we expect to have a guilder class on that page (its currently a class stub).

    We we don't imagine we'll actually have a guilder class, the page can just be converted to a Guilder (rank) type of page with links to the two homebrew guilders linked there now, and the possibility of a Guilder (class).

    While I'm on the subject, I think we should disambiguate Noble as well, putting class information on Noble (class) and discussion of the role of nobles on Noble (rank).

    Thoughts?

  3. #3
    I think it should be treated as its own class as 3rd edition.
    4th I would put it as a paragon class for a new class like a noble class.
    Last edited by Wilenburg; 07-01-2008 at 03:21 AM.

  4. #4
    Site Moderator Sorontar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    4,252
    Downloads
    88
    Uploads
    8
    Given the content of the page at the moment, I would just make it a page about how Guilders fit in society, then have the "how to play a guilder" summary details that are on the present page at the end.

    So it is a rank page with links to how people would play NPC/PC guilders.

    Oh, and somewhere on the page is a blooded vs unblooded guilder comparison.

    Sorontar

  5. #5
    Site Moderator kgauck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Springfield Mo
    Posts
    3,562
    Downloads
    2
    Uploads
    0
    We do have a proper Noble class, what about that case?

  6. #6
    Site Moderator Sorontar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    4,252
    Downloads
    88
    Uploads
    8
    The Noble page creates a few "problems". First of all, it is part of the BRCS so it can't itself be modified. However, we can stick SeeAlso links on it (as was done to link your variant KG).

    The basic stuff about Nobles and society is already there. Perhaps we could just have a page (with SeeAlso from [[BRCS: ...Noble]]) explaining why not every member of the nobility has the Noble class, and how some regents with a noble upbringing can be regents without the class (even if they have Diplomacy, Administrate etc as skills) That is what I think needs to be "clarified".

    The alternative is to change [[Noble]] to a page on the rank side, and link from there to the BRCS class (plus variants). The explanation I mentioned above could then be put on the new [[Noble]] page.

    Sorontar.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Guilder (version by: Thelandrin)
    By Thelandrin in forum BRWiki Discussions
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-29-2007, 11:33 AM
  2. What is the Guilder?
    By kgauck in forum The Royal Library
    Replies: 46
    Last Post: 03-14-2007, 05:34 AM
  3. Return of the Guilder
    By Fizz in forum The Royal Library
    Replies: 152
    Last Post: 01-29-2007, 10:41 AM
  4. Guilder class write up
    By kgauck in forum The Royal Library
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-07-2002, 05:47 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
BIRTHRIGHT, DUNGEONS & DRAGONS, D&D, the BIRTHRIGHT logo, and the D&D logo are trademarks owned by Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and are used by permission. ©2002-2010 Wizards of the Coast, Inc.