Results 11 to 20 of 20
Thread: lead question
-
07-17-2007, 03:58 PM #11
Just for the record, Kgauck, I do think that's getting a touch specialised on the old skills. Craft skillsare generally used in the production industry - armour, weapons, cooking, stone-carving etc. I'd use the Profession skill you mentioned, but I'd couple it with Perform (orator), so at least I'm not wasting two sets of skill points simply for the price of one.
-
07-17-2007, 08:00 PM #12
Writing for content should be an INT based skill and so is a Craft skill. Writing is a craft. A lot of art is craft as well: woodworking, painting, sculpting. Profession is a Wisdom based skill and described the ability to handle the professional angle of the job, not the actual content production. Having Profession (Humanist) means I know how to get a patron, how to please a patron, how to balance the kind of serious work that my peers appreciate and will make me a name for posterity with the kind of work that pleases my patron, and how, when I am lucky to combine the two. But it doesn't mean I know how to write, only that I know how to find work as a writer.
Perform (Orator) is really the same thing as Leadership, unless people hire professional speach-givers. If I centered a capaign around Law Holdings, where everyone played lawyers in the service of a regent, I'd use Perform (Oratory). Otherwise, Leadership fills the bill nicely.
-
07-17-2007, 08:08 PM #13
That's probably true, but I was considering it more from a Core Rules set-up. What with the 3.5 drive to reduce expenditure of skill points on barely used or very specialised skills, I'm always one to try to reduce unecessary spending.
I am of course all for roleplaying with skill points - my characters always have miscellaneous skills in music or crafts or similar, even if they're nothing to do with their jobs. I'm just not in favour of people wasting their skills wholesale - such as the person who took 6 ranks in Knowledge (Tarot) and refused to put any in Knowledge (arcana). N.B. Actual example!
-
07-17-2007, 09:06 PM #14
Its a question of specialization vs generalization. In a court, the PC's must have specialists who get technical jobs to do. Win the law case, craft the treaty, make the sword, fortell the future, and so on. The PC's staff their court and direct the actions of their servants (and making rolls for them and what not). The PC should not have ranks in things for which they have people to do things. On the other hand, the specialist servants of the PC's ought to be real specialists, min-max'd for their job.
Darien Avan's groom may well be a 6th level Expert with Skill Focus (Handle Animal) and Animal Affinity. He may also have Skill Focus (Profession:Animal Handler), and Skill Focus (Ride). I'd want to max his ranks in Handle Animal, Profession (Animal Handler), and Ride. I'd be inclined to spend ranks in Heal, Intimidate, Knowledge (Equine), Diplomacy, and maybe Craft (Leatherworking). Not because Darien's groom fixes stirrups or cares for his horse when its sick, Darien has top experts in those fields too. Rather because the groom knows Darien's warhorse, riding horse, and the young colt which will one day be Darien's warhorse. He has to know when to summon the Healer and when to summon the saddler to do their expert work.
-
07-17-2007, 09:33 PM #15
I'd actually agree with all that, but I'd broaden Knowledge (Equine) to Knowledge (Nature). After all, if anyone is going to have an epiphany and become an adventuring PC ranger, it's going to be the stableboy or animal trainer or royal groom.
-
07-17-2007, 10:11 PM #16
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
- Location
- Virginia Beach, Virginia
- Posts
- 3,945
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
Now didn't I say that preparing the "flyers" was a separate action - either a character action or a court action?
So I think we are saying the same thing here - preparing the "flyers" is the time before the speeches part. Using Lead to make free action speeches as part of another action precludes spending GB for the action.
Making the flyers would reflect spending GB but that has to be done earlier than performing the speeches - hence you shouldn't be able to spend GB to modify the result of the Lead action - since that is spending the money at the time not ahead of time.Duane Eggert
-
07-18-2007, 01:05 AM #17
Spending money to prepare flyers ahead of time is really a 17th century thing to do. Perhaps the most famous example is William or Orange's publication of pamphlets prior to his landing in England in 1688.
But during the 1st century after the invention of the printing press, production of pamphlets is just something that happened on its own, from the point of view of of regents. They didn't cause pamphlets to be made, and their first responce to the new pamphlets was to try and shut them down, not establish public affairs ministries. Soon they decided to befriend sympathetic printers. But the printing was done because it made money for the printer. Printers often adopted a friendly posture because they wanted source material, not neccesarily because they agreed with what the regent was doing.
In short, pamphleteering is not something that regents controlled. Especially where their are guilders not easily controlled by other kinds of regents, and where printing could be done in neighboring territories and moved easily across land into someone elses spehere of influence.
-
07-18-2007, 01:28 AM #18
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
- Location
- Virginia Beach, Virginia
- Posts
- 3,945
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
The point of lead used in this way was to influence the opinion of people.
Since this is game use and not necessarily real life it does make a difference too.
And since this was the example you brought up of how spending GB could be used to augment the lead method of agitate then it is clearly tied to the person attempting to agitate. Note that this agitate does not have to be performed by the province ruler either.Duane Eggert
-
07-18-2007, 03:31 AM #19
My point was that spending gold was really just prolifferating pamphlets, not preparing pamphlets as part of a broader propaganda campaign. Just because players can imagine a modern use of printed material (a domain run newspaper, for example) doesn't mean I'll allow it.
Its not a question of being strictly historical, its recognizing that stuff happens for reasons that make sense in the context of the world, and that too much of an appeal to public opinion suggests that soveriegntly lies genuinly in the hands of the people (at least in the last resort) instead of being the birthright of regents all of whom are decended from the heros of Diesmaar.
-
07-18-2007, 11:05 PM #20
On the other hand while people power can undermine a regent, it is by its nature what empowers them, making BR regents more likely in my opinion to play to the crowd than historic rulers. I'm wondering about giving RP rewards to characters who do heroic deeds that lift them in the eyes of the populace to reflect a brief formation of the regency link.
I'm considering the way regency works - it could be that when the regent talks the printers are more likely to hear, and more likely to agree, than someone unblooded speaks (if you've played Feng Shui regency would therefore act in a similar manner to how control of sites impacts popular perception). The spending of RP certainly could therefore indicate that pamphlets are being printed supporting the regent's viewpoint, mocking the regent's opponents. GB spend could indicate nobles funneling taxes to fund the pamphlets and the like.
Gb spend on agitates is however in my view more likely to be big stuff like national celebrations, tax cuts, rewards for local heroes, bribes for local priests, publicans and bards etc - you could get an awful lot of pamphlets printed for 1 GB and town criers, etc are more likely to reach the masses until literacy goes beyond the nobility.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks