I haven`t had this situation come up yet in a game, but was wondering what
people`s thoughts were on this subject:

"Great losses are caused by the occupation or destruction of
a significant portion of your domain or a military catastrophe.
Great losses are generally the result of only by negligence,
gross incompetence, or significant failure. A great loss of RP
results in a loss of RP equal to 4d4 times the regent`s bloodline
ability score." -BRCS, pg 101.



Okay, first, when a regent is suffering the loss of "a significant portion
of [his] domain", is he really going to have that much regency just lying
around waiting for the land to suck away? What if he doesn`t have enough?
I think I missed that somewhere.

Second, while I realize the thematic appropriateness of it, from a GAME
point of view, do we really want to kick the people who are down and help
out the people who are winning? I mean, provinces are a means of production
and resource generation... the victor has already claimed the means of
production for gold and regency, is it really a good idea to ALSO take away
regency from the player that`s lost the means to produce it?