Results 1 to 10 of 16
Thread: Status quo
-
08-18-2006, 09:36 PM #1
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Posts
- 22
- Downloads
- 16
- Uploads
- 0
Status quo
I've been lucky enough to have been in a fairly consistent gaming group that is obsessed with the Birthright setting (I actually was introduced to this setting by the group) so I've played roughly 5 campaigns each lasting between one and six years.
In this time I've seen a number of different methods for maintaining the integrity of the Birthright world. I've seen some GM's allow the players to run willynilly with vast, incomprehensible armies - forging themselves a new continental (or at least regional) Empire almost without any significant resistance. I've also seen campaigns where upon the slightest move out of the ordinary they are smited down by overwhelming forces.
I've always prefered to maintain the status quo of Cerilian politics, making every little gain a major event. To me the world has become fairly established after the fall of Anuire and the lines have been drawn for many of the continent's regents. Alliances are forged, trade relations set, enemies and friends named. Also these nations have had decades, if not centuries, of some level of "stagnation" (I use the term loosely, i suppose stability would be more apt) and have some length of time without major events or expansion to accumulate a healthy treasury and a formidable reserve of regency.
That said I've always found it best to place the players as "small fish in a big pond". They're newcomers to this royal members only club, with no friends and no established relations - and quite frankly the established rulers look down on these newcomers. That said I try to make it difficult to expand their influence into all but the most lawless regions. Often attempts to forge holdings are met with heavy resistance from the dominant regents of the area and these contests are often accompanied by threats.
For my players every domain action is a struggle to maintain their holdings, so often expansion must be taken slowly and carefully - the shrewd will inheret the land. Player-run empires covering all holding types and vast expanses simply isn't feasible against the aggressive and disdainful NPCs.
Does this differ for most groups?
-
08-18-2006, 10:31 PM #2
- Join Date
- Jul 2004
- Posts
- 125
- Downloads
- 81
- Uploads
- 0
I've seen both the vast empires quickly garnered, and the work for every scrap of holding that you have. Obviously, I prefer the latter.
BRCS, IMO, works to limit this better than 2e ever did.
-
08-19-2006, 10:11 AM #3
The rules of 2ed Brt don't match with world's history.
-
08-19-2006, 05:53 PM #4
Every Group is different in My experience. I think that in any setting, inexperienced G's allow players to garner power too quickly, or too slowly. As we gain experience we learn to control things, and allow the players to steadily gain power, but at the rate we want them too.
I never give anything to my players,they have to earn it. The greater the risks, the greater the rewards. Risk too much and lose it.
Another way to put it..
When you play the game of thrones you win or you die.
-
08-21-2006, 06:01 AM #5
Too much sessess leads to stagnation
Much as previously described, I've seen overhwelming world empires develop. This has created a much less interesting campaign world as all the major challenges have been resolved. That balence is the key to a good ongoing campaign.
-
08-21-2006, 06:35 AM #6
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Posts
- 124
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
The one thing I try to avoid in any Birthright game I
run: No Tolkien-like scenerio!
I just don`t like it when the Gorgon "nearly conquers
all from his mountain stronghold" and the party stops
him. Don`t like it.
Something I DO like is that the Gorgon is
there...directly bordering three regions. He can be a
great influence on the campaign without actually
trying to conquer the world...something he could never
do...or he would have done it long ago!
Better that the major Awnsheigh are distant threats
until the party is foolish enough to try and prove
their mettle by taking them on..."silly hero, I`m the
Gorgon! You should go away and try to kill a
dragon...which isn`t as dangerous as me, but could
still level your pitiful kingdom like it was a box of
tinder..."
Anthony Edwards
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
-
08-21-2006, 06:54 AM #7
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Posts
- 190
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
Meh.
My position on this can be summarised as follows: If it has stats, you can kill it.
I don't see what the problem is in PCs eventually taking out the Gorgon, re-establishing the Anuirean empire, and basically "winning". Let them. Doesn't have to be easy, but it doesn't have to be impossible, either.
-
08-21-2006, 10:25 AM #8
-
08-21-2006, 10:26 AM #9
Originally Posted by Cargaroth
-
08-21-2006, 05:31 PM #10
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Posts
- 124
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
Not impossible...just nearly so.
If a being has been alive for well over 1500 years, he
should have an escape plan at least! And the more
powerful Awnsheigh should have so many contingency
plans that it boggles the mind.
Its just that the very first thing I noticed about
Birthright was the Tolkien feel of the Gorgon as a
Sauron type figure...should only be ONE way to get rid
of the guy...and he should have "Mount Doom" a LITTLE
more guarded!
Anthony Edwards
--- gazza666 <brnetboard@BIRTHRIGHT.NET> wrote:
> This post was generated by the Birthright.net
> message forum.
> You can view the entire thread at:
>
http://www.birthright.net/showthread.php?goto=newpost&t=3076
>
> gazza666 wrote:
> Meh.
>
> My position on this can be summarised as follows: If
> it has stats, you can kill it.
>
> I don`t see what the problem is in PCs eventually
> taking out the Gorgon, re-establishing the Anuirean
> empire, and basically "winning". Let them. Doesn`t
> have to be easy, but it doesn`t have to be
> impossible, either.
>
>
>
> Birthright-l Archives:
> http://oracle.wizards.com/archives/birthright-l.html
> To unsubscribe, send email to
> LISTSERV@ORACLE.WIZARDS.COM
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks