View Poll Results: How do you best describe the rules you use?
- Voters
- 64. You may not vote on this poll
-
2nd rules with few house rules
10 15.63% -
2nd edition rules with lots of house rules
0 0% -
2nd ed – drop in sections (e.g., domain, bloodlines, etc.) into a different “setting”
1 1.56% -
BRCS with few house rules
27 42.19% -
BRCS with lots of house rules
16 25.00% -
BRCS – drop in sections (e.g., domain, bloodlines, etc.) into a different “setting”
3 4.69% -
Other – please provide details
4 6.25% -
Abstain
3 4.69%
Results 41 to 41 of 41
-
09-04-2006, 04:11 AM #41
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Posts
- 190
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
Originally Posted by Autarkis
Remember also that NPCs don't have to play by the same rules. If it suits a DM to have an NPC suddenly get the full benefit of his new investiture (adding as many levels as necessary), then so be it. Game balance only applies to PCs.
Indeed, from the perspective of the setting, there really aren't any NPCs in 2nd edition that are low level and yet have great bloodlines. The fact that it was possible to do this as a PC can be viewed as a flaw in the rules rather than a feature, and that the BRCS "patch" fixes things to better reflect the intention of the setting.
Naturally that's a subjective opinion, but it seems to be a valid position to hold.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks