Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    419
    Downloads
    23
    Uploads
    0

    What do you find most/least enjoyable about Birthright?

    I'm curious what aspects of the game people find most enjoyable -- and therefore what should be focused on to make the game more fun, improve the game, or grow the game.

    Is it the domain level play?
    The setting?
    The political intrigue in PBP posts?
    Is it the rules and rules tweaking?

    Does anything bog you down or make things less enjoyable?
    Perhaps complexity, or length of time to play or resolve things?
    Difficulty mixing domain level play with adventure, or with storylines and court intrigue with other players?

    Please don't limit yourself to this list

    Interested to hear about what you think makes Birthright great, and what holds it back.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio, United States
    Posts
    430
    Downloads
    12
    Uploads
    0
    [QUOTE=Rowan;91733]
    Is it the domain level play?
    The setting?
    The political intrigue in PBP posts?
    Is it the rules and rules tweaking?[/quote\]

    Of these, what I remember about interesting me in the first place, it was 1,2,and 4 of this list. I liked a setting that was less "kitchen sink" than FR or GH, more defined. The powers and clerics and rules adjustments were sellers, too.

    Does anything bog you down or make things less enjoyable?
    Perhaps complexity, or length of time to play or resolve things?
    Difficulty mixing domain level play with adventure, or with storylines and court intrigue with other players?
    I've never gotten a domain-level game really off the ground, they usually bog down in complexity. The DM has many NPC realms to monitor. Even if they are inactive for a given round, there's still a lot to watch and keep track of.
    I've had better success mixing adventure-level play with a limited amount of domain and intrigue; the latter just don't sell among my players.

  3. #3
    Administrator Arius Vistoon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Paris ( france )
    Posts
    291
    Downloads
    268
    Uploads
    1
    hi,
    for my me and my players is the setting attract us but in game...strangely, it's a balanced between domain level (the less), intrigue (the most but not from the setting) so all our campaign take place in my world like "normal game" and since fews yeras, with my own rules (inspired from birthright, pathfinder and hârnmanor)

  4. #4
    Senior Member Mirviriam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Where the moon cuts the wind.
    Posts
    250
    Downloads
    4
    Uploads
    0
    I saw the art - huge armies etc & knew I wanted a piece of that action.

    After reading the box, the rulership & the blood seemed very cool. Especially in context of 2nd Edition - which, as discussed by the makers of the game at conventions we attended the two ways people differentiated their characters was their mid level assistants/horde/followers/army or their magic items. (some caveating here - it had been a 2 hour panel with 7 past & current makers of DND - so this conversation wandered everywhere).

    When I opened my first box set up, I was floored by the fact that there was even more art & then by cast of characters along with their intertwining stories. I felt like I was reading a novel instead of DND manuals - was very exciting.

    Immersive. Epic. Huge ... so much potential for fitting into various adventure hooks they setup or slipping your own in there too. I know there's newer campaigns that encompass some of the same ideas, but this was the one I discovered and fueled most of my time in DND, even when I didn't use blooded regents or the nation names etc - this was the epic campaign set - some how whitewolf, dark sun, dragonlance & forgotten realms just seemed so much smaller than Birthright when reading through the box set.

    It blew my mind when I discovered that the carefully arranged countries of Anuire were just one portion and no where near the biggest portion of the world that was designed.
    Legacy of Kings: Member

  5. #5
    Member Rond0017's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    37
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    For me it was a mix of the high level of play (running a realm/guild/temple is awesome!!) mixed with the politics and intrigue.

    Complexity for me is a double edged sword. I love the fact that you can build all the different buildings, they all give bonuses, and are all needed for something; but the upkeep, the domain asset tracking gets to be a nightmare. The original rules were WAY too heavy into bonuses and stat stacking. I'm sure many of us that still run the game have found our own set of rules based of the originals. (I know I have done extensive manipulation in my games. Domain tax collection was a nightmare!!)

    I have also found that my plyers struggle with creating events on their own, often times only reacting to other things. Which means I, as a DM, need to constantly be prodding them with NPCs.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    316
    Downloads
    66
    Uploads
    0
    I think i was first attracted to Birthright for the setting itself. It's recognizable as D&D, but yet had enough twists to make things surprising. This is a setting where elves speak "welsh" and may very well want to kill you, where magic and real wizards are rare, where true monsters run domains, and where seeing a dragon may be a once-in-a-lifetime event. I guess putting magic in its place (that is, not the domain of normal men) always had high appeal to me.

    Also, history! I don't think many settings established as solid a history as Birthright did. This really helps drive plots and adventures- good idea fodder.

    While i liked the potential to run domains, (politics, battles, etc), i didn't make use of that for many years. And even though i liked the notion of blood powers, i never cared for how many of them were implemented- too many were too much like spells i guess.

    As i got more into it, i developed quite a like for the Shadow World. At first i thought it was just going to be a version of Ravenloft, but i'm glad that as it developed it became much more weird and unique.


    -Fizz
    Last edited by Fizz; 11-23-2016 at 03:01 AM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-01-2014, 08:07 PM
  2. Find Traps
    By Arjan in forum Main
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-05-2011, 01:01 AM
  3. Find the Path
    By Arjan in forum Main
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-05-2011, 01:01 AM
  4. Trying to find a conversion for BR to 3.5e
    By Aren Yashar in forum BRWiki Discussions
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-01-2006, 12:04 PM
  5. How to find it ???????
    By Jokeman in forum The Royal Library
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-08-2003, 08:55 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
BIRTHRIGHT, DUNGEONS & DRAGONS, D&D, the BIRTHRIGHT logo, and the D&D logo are trademarks owned by Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and are used by permission. ©2002-2010 Wizards of the Coast, Inc.