Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11
  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Christchurch, New Zealand
    Posts
    6
    Downloads
    20
    Uploads
    1

    Holding Regency - Any Reason for Class Restriction?

    Hi all

    After a long time away from D&D, D&D 5e has bought me back and I am looking at running a Birthright game (as BR was always my favorite setting). This question isn't really 5e specific but given it is for a potential 5e game, I thought I would post it here.

    In the BR 2e rules, certain classes get Regency from certain holdings. In considering those classes which didn't exist previously however, it occurred to me to wonder whether it is in fact necessary, particularly with how easy multi-classing is in D&D 5e?

    Is there any reason why you can't let any class gain Regency from any holding? There is an effective limit to controlling too many holdings being the maintenance cost so at some point you need to do a cost benefit analysis on whether it is worth, say, a Fighter Regent, controlling Sources or Temples.

    Sure those holdings bring in Regency, and Temples bring in cash, but the Fighter can't use them to cast Realm Spells (unless they have Ritual Casting? In which case, they are limited to spells of 1/2 their level - in BR terms, they have a caster level of 1/2 their character level) or have multi-classed into Wizard/Priest) but they add up in maintenance costs (EDIT: Also, they are still limited in how much Regency they can accumulate by bloodline strength).

    Will it break anything if I let this occur?
    Last edited by zcthu3; 01-01-2015 at 12:02 AM.

  2. #2
    Ehrshegh of Spelling Thelandrin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,089
    Downloads
    64
    Uploads
    0
    Well, it's not really in keeping with the general setting to allow universal access to regency, but if you're concerned about limiting RP to class choices, how about trying skill proficiencies? They're limited, but not impossibly so, and present significant opportunity costs for attempting to sew up all holding RP in one character.

    For instance:
    Temples might require Religion proficiency and 1st-level divine spells
    Sources might need Arcana or Nature and 1st-level arcane spells (plus the ability to use True Magic)
    Laws could require History (for law & politics) and Warcraft (Int-based; military activities)
    Guilds might be Thieves' Cant or a artisan's tool proficiency, plus either Deception or Persuasion

    Ius Hibernicum, in nomine juris. Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.

  3. #3
    Site Moderator AndrewTall's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Chelmsford, Essex, England
    Posts
    2,327
    Downloads
    27
    Uploads
    0
    The BRCS moved away in part from the class=regency approach by moving it towards a skill collection method, although the skills were somewhat "rigged" in favour of the "expected class".

    Personally I'm leaning towards a "regent class", it wouldn't provide any table-top benefits, but would solely relate to domain level play.

    As levels progressed the regent would get more regency, gold, action bonuses, and perhaps even ation numbers and options, based on what choices they made - effectively a skill-points and feats approach to a class.

    The downside would be tracking the classes separately, but in the context of the amount of book-keeping in BR it wouldn't be substantial, and at PBeM level you could likely drop the table-top[ class stuff completely beyond flavour.

  4. #4
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Christchurch, New Zealand
    Posts
    6
    Downloads
    20
    Uploads
    1
    Thanks for those responses.

    I did consider the setting implications and initially I wasn't going to change things. But upon further consideration, and given how easy multi-classing is (or picking up limited spell casting via Ritual Magic) and the RP limiting nature of bloodlines, it didn't seem worthwhile. Furthermore I note that even in the original rules, classes could have Holdings that they couldn't gain Regency from and I can't really see any reason why a Thief was any better a guild-master (of a legal guild) than a Fighter or Wizard (for example).

    Having said that, I have limited the ability to cast realm spells - you must be able to cast ritual spells with either Intelligence (Wizard) or Wisdom (Priest) and have access to the relevant holding. Out of the gate that limits Realm Spells to Wizards, Clerics and Druids.

    However, tying Regency collection to having appropriate skills could work nicely. Reflecting on that however, it doesn't appear to be as easy to pick up skills as it was in 3rd (i.e. no skill points per level; I never played 4th beyond a short FR game, so no idea how easy it was then), which means you really need to do make sure you have the skill at first level, even if not starting play as a regent.

    Currently the conversion I have sent out to my players just as everyone able to collect regency for any holding, but I will look at skills again. Thanks!

    EDIT: I have actually drafted up a skill based version and run it past a couple of my players. We are pretty happy with it. Thanks for the input!
    Last edited by zcthu3; 01-02-2015 at 09:19 AM.

  5. #5
    Ehrshegh of Spelling Thelandrin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,089
    Downloads
    64
    Uploads
    0
    Do feel free to post your system. I threw the above together on reading your post, so I'd like to see what you've come up with. The more the merrier, after all.

    Ius Hibernicum, in nomine juris. Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.

  6. #6
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Christchurch, New Zealand
    Posts
    6
    Downloads
    20
    Uploads
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Thelandrin View Post
    Do feel free to post your system. I threw the above together on reading your post, so I'd like to see what you've come up with. The more the merrier, after all.
    Sorry for the delay in responding; I need to check my settings as I wasn't emailed when there was a response .

    I have attached a copy of the conversion doc we intend to use. Hopefully you find it of some use. A couple of things:

    1. Our group isn't overly concerned with balance; given that I have tried to stay true to the spirit of the rules, rather than any sort of mechanical balance. Given that, some blood abilities (in particular) may be completely unbalanced.

    2. This conversion has borrowed from other conversions linked to from this site and I haven't included credits in the doc (as it was going to be for our home game). I would like to give due credit if this is going to go further, but can't remember who posted what. If you find something in it that you suggested/converted and which I have then used, thank for your assistance and please let me know so I can attribute it.

    Also, it has some house rules (which I have left in) around unblooded regents, mainly as something might happen in the future of the campaign which might see it being necessary to have rules for such.
    Attached Files Attached Files

  7. #7
    Ehrshegh of Spelling Thelandrin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,089
    Downloads
    64
    Uploads
    0
    Thanks for that. Why not upload it to the downloads section of BR.net as well?

    Ius Hibernicum, in nomine juris. Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.

  8. #8
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Christchurch, New Zealand
    Posts
    6
    Downloads
    20
    Uploads
    1
    Done

  9. #9
    Site Moderator Sorontar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    3,950
    Downloads
    25
    Uploads
    1
    Thanks for that. I'll update the 5e BR wiki page later.
    Sorontar
    Information Communication ILLUMINATION!!

  10. #10
    Senior Member arpig2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Ottawa, Ontario
    Posts
    218
    Downloads
    74
    Uploads
    6
    The main reason, as far as I can see, for keeping the class specific regency collection is to make somebody want Law holdings. Without them everybody will fight over the Guild & temple holdings because they generate the most cash. Even with the class restrictions it is hard to keep the province ruler from grabbing all the Guild holdings just for their income.
    Call me Bob.
    My Zaidan-Tai site: http://bobsworlds.x10.mx/Zaidan/
    My Zaidan-Tai PBEM: http://nrggames.proboards.com/
    My Tollanar blog: https://bobsworlds.wordpress.com/

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Elven alignment restriction
    By gazza666 in forum The Royal Library
    Replies: 42
    Last Post: 07-18-2006, 01:57 AM
  2. Regency vs Class
    By Slaine the Horned God in forum The Royal Library
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 10-17-2002, 07:31 PM
  3. Alternate Regency and Source Holding Ideas
    By VerusNoctis in forum The Royal Library
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-03-2002, 05:01 PM
  4. Regency/holding/souces question
    By Olesens in forum MPGN Mailinglist archive 1996-1999
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-10-1999, 02:55 PM
  5. Regency/holding/souces questions?
    By Soviet in forum MPGN Mailinglist archive 1996-1999
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-08-1999, 02:48 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
BIRTHRIGHT, DUNGEONS & DRAGONS, D&D, the BIRTHRIGHT logo, and the D&D logo are trademarks owned by Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and are used by permission. ©2002-2010 Wizards of the Coast, Inc.