Results 1 to 3 of 3
Thread: Discussions on battle grid size
-
03-18-2005, 10:40 AM #1Birthright Developer
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
- Location
- Virginia Beach, Virginia
- Posts
- 3,945
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
Let's do some engaging here on what would be the best size for a battle grid square. Based on the results of the last poll and the choices presented the votes were all around the place.
Based on the discussion from the poll I'd recommend a 100 ft square battle square.Duane Eggert
-
03-18-2005, 11:24 PM #2Senior Member
- Join Date
- May 2003
- Location
- Moschato, Athens, Greece
- Posts
- 1,128
- Downloads
- 1
- Uploads
- 0
Agreed; not only is it close to the 200-men unit equivalency, it also fits nicely with preexisting mechanics (like spell ranges).
-
03-19-2005, 04:51 AM #3Senior Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2003
- Posts
- 1,475
- Downloads
- 34
- Uploads
- 8
If the Stack/No Stack poll closes the way it looks now, there will be no stacking in the battlesytem. In which case 100' squares seem pretty optimal. They're so fitting in fact that I really don't think another poll is necessary. The last one on battle grid size was useful in part just to illustrate and discuss the dynamics and consequences of changing the size of grid squares on the battlefield.
Osprey
Reply With Quote
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Tags for this Thread
battle,
battlefield,
close,
consequence,
consequences,
discussion,
grid,
place,
poll,
result,
results,
size,
spell,
stack,
unit,
vote,
votes
Bookmarks