View Poll Results: What should be the approx. size of a battle unit (i.e., troop)?

Voters
18. You may not vote on this poll
  • 1. Approx 200 individuals (the 2nd ed standard)

    15 83.33%
  • 2. Approx 100 individuals

    2 11.11%
  • 3. Approx 20 individuals

    1 5.56%
  • 4. Other - please specify

    0 0%
  • 5. Abstain

    0 0%
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12
  1. #11
    Birthright Developer irdeggman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Virginia Beach, Virginia
    Posts
    3,945
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Time to close this poll. Here are the results:

    What should be the approx. size of a battle unit (i.e., troop)?
    1. Approx 200 individuals (the 2nd ed standard) [ 15 ] [83.33%]
    2. Approx 100 individuals [ 2 ] [11.11%]
    3. Approx 20 individuals [ 1 ] [5.56%]
    4. Other - please specify [ 0 ] [0.00%]
    5. Abstain [ 0 ] [0.00%]
    Total Votes: 18


    People want to keep the 2nd ed/BRCS-playtest concept of abtract troop size of 200 members.
    Duane Eggert

  2. #12
    Birthright Developer
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    USA.
    Posts
    626
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 04:28:12AM +0100, irdeggman wrote:

    > This post was generated by the Birthright.net message forum.

    > You can view the entire thread at:

    > http://www.birthright.net/forums/ind...ST&f=36&t=3020

    >

    > irdeggman wrote:

    > Time to close this poll. Here are the results:

    >

    > What should be the approx. size of a battle unit (i.e., troop)?

    > 1. Approx 200 individuals (the 2nd ed standard) [ 15 ] [83.33%]

    > 2. Approx 100 individuals [ 2 ] [11.11%]

    > 3. Approx 20 individuals [ 1 ] [5.56%]

    > 4. Other - please specify [ 0 ] [0.00%]

    > 5. Abstain [ 0 ] [0.00%]

    > Total Votes: 18

    >

    >

    > People want to keep the 2nd ed/BRCS-playtest concept of abtract troop size of 200 members.



    Not to muddy the waters or anything, but it may be worth considering the fact that

    the number of individuals isn`t as important as effective deployment of strength.

    It would probably be an ineffective deployment of strength to send 200 hardened Varsk

    Riders against 200 individuals in a levy. One might be far better of sending 20

    or 30 Varsk riders out and sending the others to fight a different force. Thus, I`d

    argue that, in the spirit of abstraction, the number of individuals in a fighting

    unit is not as important as its measure of "power" (for which CR/EL seems to be an

    appropriate measure).



    If a unit is defined as some arbitrary CR/EL then a "unit" of levies

    might include 400 1/2 CR individuals and a "unit" of Varsk Riders might

    include only 50 soliders with mounts. On the field, they might be

    "roughly" appropriate numbers to send at each other.



    If the system is re-designed to simply use numbers of individuals, then the war

    card metrics are going to have to be signiciantly more varied (as 200 levies Vs.

    200 Varsk Riders will hardly require a roll and should be solvable in one war

    round).



    - Doom

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
BIRTHRIGHT, DUNGEONS & DRAGONS, D&D, the BIRTHRIGHT logo, and the D&D logo are trademarks owned by Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and are used by permission. ©2002-2010 Wizards of the Coast, Inc.