Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Question

  1. #1
    Sean Brown
    Guest

    Question

    > I am running a Birth Right To-Each-His-Own-Thrown style of game.
    >
    > My question for you:
    > What would you do in this situation?
    >
    > A character is mustering troops in a turn and gets his/her province
    > occupied by enemies during the same turn.
    >
    > Does the character loose the troops that are beign mustered?

    Assuming the character still has a domain (ie, is still a regent)
    there is no reason to think that the troops still don't exist (of
    course, they are now behind enemy lines) The regent who created them
    shold still have controll, but must now move them through occupied
    territory, or fight the troops therin before moving.

    Sean

  2. #2
    George & Connie Loken
    Guest

    Question

    I am running a Birth Right To-Each-His-Own-Thrown style of game.

    My question for you:
    What would you do in this situation?

    A character is mustering troops in a turn and gets his/her province
    occupied by enemies during the same turn.

    Does the character loose the troops that are beign mustered?

    Thanks
    George Loken

  3. #3
    cmurphy@staterail.nsw.go
    Guest

    Question

    George & Connie Loken wrote:
    >
    > I am running a Birth Right To-Each-His-Own-Thrown style of game.
    >
    > My question for you:
    > What would you do in this situation?
    >
    > A character is mustering troops in a turn and gets his/her province
    > occupied by enemies during the same turn.
    >
    > Does the character loose the troops that are beign mustered?
    >
    > Thanks
    > George Loken
    > ************************************************** *************************
    > > 'unsubscribe birthright' as the body of the message.
    It would depend on which player had the initiative for the turn. There
    are two possible situations but in neither case the player attempting to
    muster troops would loose the troops, their quality is the only thing
    that would be affected.

    If the Player mustering the troops went 1st then he would raise the
    troops and then have to deal with the attempted occupation - which would
    now be an invasion as there are defending troops in the province.

    If the invading player went 1st then you could say that the player
    mustering troops drew on the refugees fleeing the invading troops and
    limit the troops to levy class.

  4. #4
    Robert Ripley
    Guest

    question

    >
    >
    > Here's a bunch of house rules that my DM came up with, although with
    > much
    > complain from the players. They're far from perfect (they're not even
    > good)
    > but can inspire you to come up with modified improved versions.
    > First, in my campaign only two units are allowed in a single area (so
    > that
    > you can't put your 12 units army into one area).
    > When those two units are in the same battle area where two enemy units
    > are,
    > they enter melee. Only one strike is allowed per unit (they can only
    > attack
    > one unit). The defender decides which units defend which attackers
    > (Note:
    > by defender, I don't mean the defendig regent but the one who controls
    > the
    > units which are being attacked at that time), unless the attacking
    > unit is
    > using missile, whereas the attacker chooses who he/she attacks.
    > Lastly, all units get to do their attacks, being the logic that the
    > fight
    > occurs at the same time for both sides. Thus, if the attacking unit
    > causes
    > a hit in the defending unit, the defending unit still uses the ratings
    > as
    > it hadn't taken a hit at all. Only in the end of the turn do all units
    > who
    > have taken a hit tap.
    >
    > Hope this helps you improve your own rules.
    >

    For those still using the terrible war cards rules, these are two damn
    good ideas. Although they would slow the game a bit, it is far more
    realistic then having 20 war cards in one giant heap fighting another
    giant stack of war cards.

    - --

    Bob R.

    ************************************************** *****************************

    PBeM- Birthright, Regents of the Southern Marches
    http://home.earthlink.net/~bobripley/index.html
    http://molokai.ucsd.edu/pbem
    bobripley@earthlink.net
    ************************************************** *****************************

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. A Question
    By John in forum MPGN Mailinglist archive 1996-1999
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 10-20-1998, 09:15 PM
  2. Fwd: A Question
    By Shadewulf@aol.co in forum MPGN Mailinglist archive 1996-1999
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-19-1998, 08:14 PM
  3. A Question
    By Shadewulf@aol.co in forum MPGN Mailinglist archive 1996-1999
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-19-1998, 03:33 AM
  4. NPC question
    By John Ewan in forum MPGN Mailinglist archive 1996-1999
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-27-1998, 03:33 AM
  5. A Question
    By Darkstar in forum MPGN Mailinglist archive 1996-1999
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 11-01-1997, 03:59 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
BIRTHRIGHT, DUNGEONS & DRAGONS, D&D, the BIRTHRIGHT logo, and the D&D logo are trademarks owned by Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and are used by permission. ©2002-2010 Wizards of the Coast, Inc.