View Poll Results: Should Chap 1 be sanctioned?

Voters
26. You may not vote on this poll
  • 1. Yes

    20 76.92%
  • 2. No

    6 23.08%
  • 3. Abstain

    0 0%
Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 34567
Results 61 to 67 of 67
  1. #61
    Senior Member Thomas_Percy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    139
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Most of the new feats are "Master Something" with +2 for two skills.
    It's boring, not worth a place in a CS and time of the reader.
    But another way, that +2-feats are neccessary.
    Maybe you can do ONE sample/example/template feat:
    "Master of (Your Choice?)" which gives +2 bonus for two choosen by DM/PC skills?

  2. #62
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    california
    Posts
    317
    Downloads
    2
    Uploads
    0
    Originally posted by Thomas_Percy@Feb 20 2005, 07:34 AM
    Most of the new feats are "Master Something" with +2 for two skills.
    It's boring, not worth a place in a CS and time of the reader.
    But another way, that +2-feats are neccessary.
    Maybe you can do ONE sample/example/template feat:
    "Master of (Your Choice?)" which gives +2 bonus for two choosen by DM/PC skills?
    Most of the master feats are also related to getting a +2 bonus for effecting specific type of holdings.
    Build a man a fire and he will be warm for a night. Set a man on fire and he will be warm for the rest of his life.

  3. #63
    Senior Member Thomas_Percy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    139
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    But maybe there is a possibility of make it short?
    BR CS is a very big pdf and saving of 2-3 pages is not bad.

  4. #64
    Senior Member Osprey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    1,475
    Downloads
    34
    Uploads
    8
    One quick query that was raised with me is regarding the Master Administrator feat. At the moment it reads You gain a +2 bonus to Administrate checks, and a +2 bonus to Create, Contest, and Rule Province domain actions.

    Should that read Rule Holding instead of Rule Province?
    Nope - Ch 5 domain action key skills were revised (with a LOT of wrangling over the details, partly so we could hammer out the specifics of the Master feats) such that Administrate is the key skill for Rule (Create/Contest) Province only. The feat itself thus comes out far less broken than in the BRCS playtest; now it adds only to the occasional Rule Province action, but has the additional (very major) benefit of making seasonal maintenance checks still possible for larger domains. Thus, it's not just a good landed regent feat, but also an excellent lieutenant feat (as the name suggests).

    Each type of holding (Cr/Co/Rule actions) has a different key skill:
    Law: Lead
    Temples: Diplomacy
    Guilds: P/Merchant
    Trade Routes: Diplomacy
    Sources: K/Nature
    Ley Lines: K/Arcana

  5. #65
    Birthright Developer Raesene Andu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    South Australia
    Posts
    1,357
    Downloads
    1
    Uploads
    0
    Originally posted by Osprey@Feb 21 2005, 02:04 AM
    Nope - Ch 5 domain action key skills were revised (with a LOT of wrangling over the details, partly so we could hammer out the specifics of the Master feats) such that Administrate is the key skill for Rule (Create/Contest) Province only. The feat itself thus comes out far less broken than in the BRCS playtest; now it adds only to the occasional Rule Province action, but has the additional (very major) benefit of making seasonal maintenance checks still possible for larger domains. Thus, it's not just a good landed regent feat, but also an excellent lieutenant feat (as the name suggests).

    Each type of holding (Cr/Co/Rule actions) has a different key skill:
    Law: Lead
    Temples: Diplomacy
    Guilds: P/Merchant
    Trade Routes: Diplomacy
    Sources: K/Nature
    Ley Lines: K/Arcana
    Ok, that makes sense then. I'll pass on the information. One query, what is the reasoning behind diplomacy as the skill for temples? The others seem logical, but wouldn't knowledge (religion) be better for temples?
    Let me claim your Birthright!!

  6. #66
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    california
    Posts
    317
    Downloads
    2
    Uploads
    0
    Originally posted by Raesene Andu@Feb 20 2005, 03:20 PM

    Ok, that makes sense then. I'll pass on the information. One query, what is the reasoning behind diplomacy as the skill for temples? The others seem logical, but wouldn't knowledge (religion) be better for temples?
    I was searching for the link to that discussion, but couldn't find it. If memory serves me, we decided (by we I mean whoever was most vocal and stubborn during that discussion) for diplomacy because expansion would be based on convincing the masses, not a display of religious or undead lore. Great theologians rarely head the fastest growing churches. A great theologian may have a high rank within a church, but it is the orally skilled preacher who will lead a church to expansion.
    Build a man a fire and he will be warm for a night. Set a man on fire and he will be warm for the rest of his life.

  7. #67
    Birthright Developer irdeggman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Virginia Beach, Virginia
    Posts
    3,945
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    I'm closing this poll Chap 1 is now considered sanctioned.

    Here are the results:

    Should Chap 1 be sanctioned?
    1. Yes [ 20 ] [76.92%]
    2. No [ 6 ] [23.08%]
    3. Abstain [ 0 ] [0.00%]
    Total Votes: 26
    Duane Eggert

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
BIRTHRIGHT, DUNGEONS & DRAGONS, D&D, the BIRTHRIGHT logo, and the D&D logo are trademarks owned by Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and are used by permission. ©2002-2010 Wizards of the Coast, Inc.