View Poll Results: Should Chap 1 be sanctioned?
- Voters
- 26. You may not vote on this poll
Results 1 to 10 of 67
Thread: Sanctioning Vote for Chap 1
-
02-05-2005, 10:45 PM #1
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
- Location
- Virginia Beach, Virginia
- Posts
- 3,945
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
All right let's see if we can wrap this up now. I think we've finally got it down. Please if there are any editorials/typos let me know - they can be fixed without any additional voting.
Duane Eggert
-
02-05-2005, 10:46 PM #2
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
- Location
- Virginia Beach, Virginia
- Posts
- 3,945
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
Here is the pdf version.
Duane Eggert
-
02-05-2005, 10:47 PM #3
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
- Location
- Virginia Beach, Virginia
- Posts
- 3,945
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
Here is the word version.
Duane Eggert
-
02-06-2005, 12:25 AM #4
All looking good to me.
Let me claim your Birthright!!
-
02-06-2005, 10:50 AM #5
Urgoshes, not Urgroshes.
The dodge bonus should be +4, not +2, right?
Otherwise seems OK...
-
02-06-2005, 02:33 PM #6
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
- Location
- Gothenburg, Sweden
- Posts
- 949
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
-
02-06-2005, 04:55 PM #7
I think the Paladin of Cuiraecen class is pretty cool. I used it for a high level Fhyllie the Sword IMC, and liked the results. The bonus feats plus paladin abilites really do a good job of conveying that militant warrior feel the class should have. Good work on that.
Overall I think Chapter 1 looks pretty good.
-
02-06-2005, 05:09 PM #8
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Location
- Montreal, Canada
- Posts
- 124
- Downloads
- 9
- Uploads
- 0
Some suggestions:
I personally consider BR a High-fantasy campaign when it comes to regents and would suggest giving regents a 32 point buy for those characters.
Change the terminology of regional background skills to cultural background skills because elsewhere the different types of humans are always referenced as a race or culture.
Regional feat mechanics were changed in 3.5 for the official game settings but has not been changed for BR. Was this a choice of the BR developpers?
-
02-06-2005, 08:10 PM #9
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
- Location
- Virginia Beach, Virginia
- Posts
- 3,945
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
Urgoshes, not Urgroshes.
Per the PHB it is urgrosh
The dodge bonus should be +4, not +2, right?Duane Eggert
-
02-06-2005, 08:29 PM #10
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
- Location
- Virginia Beach, Virginia
- Posts
- 3,945
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
I personally consider BR a High-fantasy campaign when it comes to regents and would suggest giving regents a 32 point buy for those characters.
Good point and I consider this an editorial so it will require no additional vote, as long as the terminology is consistent.
Regional feat mechanics were changed in 3.5 for the official game settings but has not been changed for BR. Was this a choice of the BR developpers?
We weren't going to continue chasing the other campaigns. I personnally don't play any Forgotten Realms games and am not going to keep on buying them just to see what is going on there - I only have a finite amount of money (just ask my wife). The method used is consistent with Wheel of Time which was a lot closer to the model used at development and the cultural/regional skill system was modified from the Wheel of Time system basically because it seemed awful harsh to limit it to a single skill with 4 ranks (all of a human's initial bonus) and have that single skill be a class skill. The concept used seemed to be more agreeable to the masses with not as many restrictions and allowed the carry over of the cultural (i.e. human race) characteristics of the 2nd ed game.Duane Eggert
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks