Results 1 to 1 of 1
-
01-14-1997, 09:40 PM #1rcantin@oricom.ca (RobinGuest
Re:Rules Interpretation/Hands full
About paladins and rager RP collection, Mike Carscadden said:
>For this ruling I would leave it to the DM's discretion but I would say
>the character would have to choose 1 ie a Palidin shouldn't collect full
>regency for both Law, Temple, and Province holdings its just too much.
>The Locust
I feel it's a matter of campaign flavor here. Characters who control lots
of holdings - either plenty of the same type or some of several types, as
the ranger and paladin - will have their hands full dealing with many
emergencies and gather lots of information, so will tend to spend these
vast amounts of RPs easely.
So I don't object to one player having vast holdings, but he'll have to
expect to be a very busy regent. Right now I'm playing in two games, one
with a small domain (Ilien) and one with a large one (Dhoesone). I often
have a lot more latitude with Ilien than in the north, since Fhiele
Dhoesone must constantly spend plenty of RPs just to respond to threats
(when she's not pregnant - but that's a story for another day).
Robin
-
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Full-Round Actions (Rules)
By Arjan in forum D20 system reference documentReplies: 0Last Post: 05-20-2007, 09:05 AM -
My interpretation for a campaign
By wooz in forum MPGN Mailinglist archive 1996-1999Replies: 0Last Post: 02-26-1998, 10:50 PM -
Rules Interpretation Trade Rout
By Robert Harper in forum MPGN Mailinglist archive 1996-1999Replies: 12Last Post: 01-11-1997, 12:11 PM -
Rules Interpretation
By Kent Lerch in forum MPGN Mailinglist archive 1996-1999Replies: 2Last Post: 01-07-1997, 04:50 PM -
Rule Interpretation
By Kent Lerch in forum MPGN Mailinglist archive 1996-1999Replies: 2Last Post: 12-03-1996, 03:40 PM
Bookmarks