Results 1 to 6 of 6
Thread: Quick army mustering question..
-
08-19-1999, 07:58 PM #1Alexander MacLeodGuest
Quick army mustering question..
>1)The req. in the Army musterin table mean a Law holding of the mentioned
>level?
>
>example:
>Infantry req: L(2)...
>2) if this is true how do priest or thieves who only control Temple/guilds
>rasie
>armies? Can they only raise mercs?
>thanks!
Nope. If you look carefully, there are little super-scripted numbers
(footnotes) in the table that indicate certain troops that can also be
mustered from certain levels of Temples or Guilds. The only thing I do not
like about these is that a Temple by itself cannot raise an order of holy
Knights. Ah, well.
- -----------------------------
Alexander H. MacLeod IV
"Americans love to fight. All real Americans love the sting of battle."
- -- Gen. George S. Patton, Jr.
__________________________________________________ _____________
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.comTo unsubscribe from this list send mail to majordomo@lists.imagiconline.com
with the line
-
08-20-1999, 10:30 AM #2Pieter SleijpenGuest
Quick army mustering question..
Soviet wrote:
>
> 1)The req. in the Army musterin table mean a Law holding of the mentioned level?
>
I always thought it ment province level...
To unsubscribe from this list send mail to majordomo@lists.imagiconline.com
with the line
-
08-20-1999, 01:07 PM #3Jeremy BakerGuest
Quick army mustering question..
>Soviet wrote:
>>
>> 1)The req. in the Army musterin table mean a Law holding of the mentioned
level?
>>
>
>I always thought it ment province level...
This was always my reading of it too.
Jeremy Baker.
To unsubscribe from this list send mail to majordomo@lists.imagiconline.com
with the line
-
08-21-1999, 07:06 PM #4Snow .Guest
Quick army mustering question..
>>1)The req. in the Army musterin table mean a Law holding of the mentioned
>>level?
>>
>>example:
>>Infantry req: L(2)...
>>2) if this is true how do priest or thieves who only control Temple/guilds
>>rasie
>>armies? Can they only raise mercs?
>>thanks!
> Nope. If you look carefully, there are little super-scripted numbers
>(footnotes) in the table that indicate certain troops that >can also be
>mustered from certain levels of Temples or Guilds. The >only thing I do not
>like about these is that a Temple by itself >cannot raise an order of holy
>Knights. Ah, well.
And in the Priestcraft book, a Priest of sufficient level and with a high
enough Temple, can raise troops in a land, against the will of the regent...
*Hugs²*,
Snow.
__________________________________________________ ____
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.comTo unsubscribe from this list send mail to majordomo@lists.imagiconline.com
with the line
-
08-21-1999, 11:20 PM #5CorrigallGuest
Quick army mustering question..
> >>1)The req. in the Army musterin table mean a Law holding of the
mentioned
> >>level?
> >>example:
> >>Infantry req: L(2)...
I'm not sure if this point has been answered already, but
it definitely means province of level 2. The little numbers
indicating footnotes give it away. To use your example,
the infantry footnote states:
Can be raised by any temple, guild, or **LAW** holding of
level 4 or better.
(Emphasis mine).
Thus if L(2) referred to law holdings, you would have
two conflicting requirements: a law (2) holding and a
law (4) holding.
- --
Alasar
To unsubscribe from this list send mail to majordomo@lists.imagiconline.com
with the line
-
08-23-1999, 07:31 AM #6Sindre Cools BergGuest
Quick army mustering question..
At 01:20 22.08.99 , Corrigall wrote:
>> >>1)The req. in the Army musterin table mean a Law holding of the
>mentioned
>> >>level?
>> >>example:
>> >>Infantry req: L(2)...
>
>I'm not sure if this point has been answered already, but
>it definitely means province of level 2. The little numbers
>indicating footnotes give it away. To use your example,
>the infantry footnote states:
>
>Can be raised by any temple, guild, or **LAW** holding of
>level 4 or better.
>
>(Emphasis mine).
>Thus if L(2) referred to law holdings, you would have
>two conflicting requirements: a law (2) holding and a
>law (4) holding.
>
>--
>Alasar
I completely agree with what has been said above and earlier in this
thread....
Though I actually think the idea that the first number is law the other is
guild or temple makes sense. That way you of course include province
requirements, and it sort of makes sense that you need to hold some sort of
sway over the populace to be able to muster proper troops. Not to mention
characters like Prince Avan's law holding network makes lots of sense
then...he simply makes sure his surroundings are not able to muster as
easily as they want.
Just a thought....
SindreTo unsubscribe from this list send mail to majordomo@lists.imagiconline.com
with the line
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Quick Bloodline question
By Raesene Andu in forum BRCS 3.0/3.5 EditionReplies: 3Last Post: 08-22-2005, 06:08 AM -
Quick army mustering question....
By Soviet in forum MPGN Mailinglist archive 1996-1999Replies: 0Last Post: 08-19-1999, 10:42 PM -
One more quick question!
By Jim Cooper in forum MPGN Mailinglist archive 1996-1999Replies: 1Last Post: 02-12-1999, 11:55 AM -
Quick Question
By Kyle Foster in forum MPGN Mailinglist archive 1996-1999Replies: 9Last Post: 05-13-1998, 10:15 AM -
RE: Quick Question
By Harding Nick MMUk in forum MPGN Mailinglist archive 1996-1999Replies: 0Last Post: 05-12-1998, 11:49 AM
Bookmarks