Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Pieter Sleijpen
    Guest

    RP`s used to modify actions

    Hi,

    Recently I have been rereading the rules for Birthright play. This
    because of differences in interpretation of the rules between me and my
    players.

    I always though that the only regents allowed to oppose or support an
    action were regents with a similar holding or the province ruler. Then I
    read the rules on page 48 of the rulebook:

    "Other regents who may be affected by the action may spend RP to
    increase or decrease the acting regent's chance of success. A regent who
    wishes to affect the roll must either rule the province or have a
    holding there."

    There is nothing about only regents with similar holdings being the only
    ones able to do it. This because one could argue that everybody is
    affected by an enemy wizard trying to gain sources or a temple who
    actively preaches against a certain guild.

    Should I ignore this when it specificly stated that only similar
    holdings can oppose it (create and rule)? While anybody could oppose
    espionage, diplomacy and build action?To unsubscribe from this list send mail to majordomo@lists.imagiconline.com
    with the line

  2. #2
    JNeighb934@aol.co
    Guest

    RP`s used to modify actions

    In a message dated 08/02/1999 2:29:20 AM Pacific Daylight Time, madfox@wxs.nl
    writes:

    > I always though that the only regents allowed to oppose or support an
    > action were regents with a similar holding or the province ruler. Then I
    > read the rules on page 48 of the rulebook:
    >
    > "Other regents who may be affected by the action may spend RP to
    > increase or decrease the acting regent's chance of success. A regent who
    > wishes to affect the roll must either rule the province or have a
    > holding there."
    >
    > There is nothing about only regents with similar holdings being the only
    > ones able to do it. This because one could argue that everybody is
    > affected by an enemy wizard trying to gain sources or a temple who
    > actively preaches against a certain guild.
    >
    > Should I ignore this when it specificly stated that only similar
    > holdings can oppose it (create and rule)? While anybody could oppose
    > espionage, diplomacy and build action?

    Taking the create are rule actions as an example, when the rules say only
    regents with a similar holding can oppose/support the action, they
    specifically mean that only those regents (with a similar holding) can apply
    their holding level as a bonus or penalty to the action check. But any
    regent with a holding(s) in the province can bid RP to support or oppose the
    action. So, a regent with similar holdings can both apply his holding
    level(s) and bid RP if he so chooses.To unsubscribe from this list send mail to majordomo@lists.imagiconline.com
    with the line

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Modify Memory, Psionic
    By Arjan in forum Main
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-05-2011, 01:01 AM
  2. Modify Memory
    By Arjan in forum Main
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-05-2011, 01:01 AM
  3. Modify Memory, Psionic (Power)
    By Arjan in forum D20 system reference document
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-19-2007, 11:05 PM
  4. Modify Memory (Spell)
    By Arjan in forum D20 system reference document
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-31-2007, 04:38 PM
  5. Barred actions
    By carla@maxisp.com.a in forum MPGN Mailinglist archive 1996-1999
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-24-1998, 11:38 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
BIRTHRIGHT, DUNGEONS & DRAGONS, D&D, the BIRTHRIGHT logo, and the D&D logo are trademarks owned by Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and are used by permission. ©2002-2010 Wizards of the Coast, Inc.