Results 1 to 2 of 2
Thread: RP and granting it to other
-
04-21-1999, 01:47 PM #1RocksHope@aol.coGuest
RP and granting it to other
In a message dated 4/21/99, 9:25:44 AM, birthright@mpgn.com writes:
-
04-21-1999, 02:15 PM #2Mark A VandermeulenGuest
RP and granting it to other
On Wed, 21 Apr 1999 RocksHope@aol.com wrote:
> A major premise of the Giantdowns accessory is that non-regents can collect
> regency for various acts that catch the attention of the people.
>
> Irregardless, I would still require a regent to take extraordinary means (ie.
> an action of his own) to "grant" RPs to another. Whether it be an
> investiture or whatever, RPs shouldn't be something that can be passed along,
> they certainly shouldn't be done secretly??
Well, I certainly agree that it can't be done secretly. If RP represent
some sort of "influence" over the collective opinions of a population, it
would certainly make sense that it would have to be known to be used. But
it would seem to me that a guilder could support a temple that was being
contested. The Guilder announces that he personally support the Church X
against the nefarious purposes of Church Y. All his factors in the
marketplace start comiserating with the shoppers, saying isn't it terrible
the things that Church Y is doing, and wouldn't it be scary if Church B
actually won. Why, they might just have to think about moving elsewhere if
that happened. After all, you know that they say about those Church Y
officials. Why I heard of a man over in...
Anyway, I guess all I'm trying to say is that I don't have a problem with
it either way.
Mark VanderMeulen
vander+@pitt.edu
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
RP and granting it to others...
By Pieter Sleijpen in forum MPGN Mailinglist archive 1996-1999Replies: 4Last Post: 04-21-1999, 01:19 PM
Bookmarks