Paring down the noble options

[addifferent]

I like the pathed version better, but the non-pathed one works too.

[Bokey]

Oops. Didn't mean to stir up contraversy. Wasn't aware that a poll had already been run regarding the BAB issue. Missed that one. Oh well, sorry.

However, barring a good BAB, what are people thinking that will make a noble a better choice than the rogue? Maybe the types of domains he can collect regency from? Or do you have some new special "feat" types in the works? I have dl the playtest, and I actually thought the noble was ok the way it was written there, but since I am out of the loop, where can I find the most current iteration?

[irdeggman]

Time to close this poll, here are the results:

Which of the following do you prefer for the noble?
(1) A ruler based noble class. [ 16 ] [53.33%]
(2) A pathed version of the above. [ 13 ] [43.33%]
(3) Abstain [ 1 ] [3.33%]
Total Votes: 30


Which puts the ruler based noble (non-pathed) ahead, if adjusting by those who said they refer the pathed version but could go with the non-pathed - one the results would be:

(1) A ruler based noble class. [20]
(2) A pathed version of the above. [9]
(3) Abstain [1]