Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Gary V. Foss
    Guest

    Children/Infanticide and bloodl

    James Knevitt wrote:

    > I) What happens when a blooded person and an unblooded person have a
    > child (I cant remember if this was in thge BR rulebook) ? I'm guessing
    > the child would have the blooded person's derivation but the strength
    > would be diluted (by about half) by the unblooded person.
    >
    > II) Here's an interesting dilemma:
    >
    > If you kill a blooded person with a blow to the heart, you get
    > yourself some bloodline points. Sweet.
    > Now, what's there to say a blooded character couldn't get himself a
    > whole harem of blooded women (under duress) dedicated to producing
    > children for him so he could kill them and steal their bloodpower when
    > they're born ?
    >
    > Any thoughts ?

    I've always thought that a person who wanted to do this kind of thing would be
    recognized pretty quickly by the people in his own nation for the horrifyingly
    brutal, sociopathic scumbag that they are, and he would probably not stay in
    power very long. Even in BR, rulership comes from a mandate of the masses and
    if the people find themselves ruled by such an obvious madman they would
    rebel. Not even goblins or orogs would endorse this kind of behavior. Some
    cultures don't have any trouble with multiple spouses, but killing off one's
    own children is pretty much one of the most heinous things someone can do.

    Assuming that the ruler still wanted to try this kind of thing, as a DM I
    wouldn't let it get that far. If he wanted to have a harem I would subject him
    to the full brunt of "realities" that situation entails. A dozen women held
    under duress means eight dozen pissed off husbands, brothers, cousins and
    boyfriends out looking for blood. If one wife is troublesome, twelve wives
    would be that much more.... My relationships lead me to the conclusion that
    one girlfriend is trouble, but two is not just twice the trouble, it is
    exponentially more. Twelve would be Trouble to the twelth.... and nobody
    could handle that much trouble believe you me, brother.... How does being
    nagged in quadraphonic stereo times three sound? I'd have a regent who tried
    to pull something like this kicking out his wives long before the first child
    was born.

    If I child was actually born, I'd probably have it squirreled off by a
    conspiracy between the mother and midwife a la the movie Willow to save it from
    death, and the regent in question would begin to find those under him working
    to undermine his authority in general not just to save the infants.

    Gary

  2. #2
    Even =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=F8
    Guest

    Children/Infanticide and bloodl

    At 20:52 27.10.98 -0800, you wrote:
    >I) What happens when a blooded person and an unblooded person have a
    >child (I cant remember if this was in thge BR rulebook) ? I'm guessing
    >the child would have the blooded person's derivation but the strength
    >would be diluted (by about half) by the unblooded person.
    >
    That is the way I play it. It is the solution that uses common sense, if not
    there would be too many blooded people after a few generations. i.e if all
    blooded regents married unblooded persons, and their children had a the full
    bloodline score there would be a huge number of blooded children running around.

    >II) Here's an interesting dilemma:
    >
    >If you kill a blooded person with a blow to the heart, you get
    >yourself some bloodline points. Sweet.
    >Now, what's there to say a blooded character couldn't get himself a
    >whole harem of blooded women (under duress) dedicated to producing
    >children for him so he could kill them and steal their bloodpower when
    >they're born ?

    As I see it, the bloodline does not manifest itself before the children
    reach their adolesence. So it would indeed be a long term plan for the
    regent if this was to work. As previously mentioned the wives would most
    certainly object, and I think the children would have a few things to say as
    well.
    >
    >Any thoughts ?

    I strongly disagree about the problem with several wives. It happens to be a
    usual custom in several eastern cultures on this planet to marry several women.

    And by the way: What SICK mind thought the plan up anyway? I know just the
    right treatment, go consult the excellent psyciatrist dr. Raesene!

    >
    >James Knevitt
    >Critical Mass Studios
    >(Makers of the Soothsayer multi-genre RPG)
    >

  3. #3
    Pieter Sleijpen
    Guest

    Children/Infanticide and bloodl

    James Knevitt wrote:
    > II) Here's an interesting dilemma:
    >
    > If you kill a blooded person with a blow to the heart, you get
    > yourself some bloodline points. Sweet.
    > Now, what's there to say a blooded character couldn't get himself a
    > whole harem of blooded women (under duress) dedicated to producing
    > children for him so he could kill them and steal their bloodpower when
    > they're born ?
    >
    > Any thoughts ?

    Sure, it is possible. Though as Even told, the blooded character would
    have to wait till the childeren are around 18 years old. It would be
    much simpler to rule a large domain and use the earned regency to raise
    the bloodline.
    As for multiple wives, the only culture on Cerilia that accepts this
    custom are the Khinasi. They also accept multiple husbands, but this
    creates some stranges things (two men and two women forming a maried
    group?!). The prerequisite is that the husband or wife earns enough to
    take good care for multiple partners. Else it will be a serious breach
    of sayim and an insult to the all the partners and their family.
    It raises an other question though, do you think awnsheiglien and
    ersheighlien can get childeren? When completely changed certainly not,
    but where do you draw the line?

  4. #4
    DKEvermore@aol.co
    Guest

    Children/Infanticide and bloodl

    In a message dated 10-27-1998 10:58:08 PM Central Standard Time,
    jknevitt@yahoo.com writes:

    > If you kill a blooded person with a blow to the heart, you get
    > yourself some bloodline points. Sweet.
    > Now, what's there to say a blooded character couldn't get himself a
    > whole harem of blooded women (under duress) dedicated to producing
    > children for him so he could kill them and steal their bloodpower when
    > they're born ?
    >
    In my game, I'd rule that you can gain no additional blood power originally,
    immediately derived from your own. In other words, the children got their
    line from their parents, so the parents get nothing by killing their own kids
    and stealing their bloodline, since it is derived from the parents,
    themselves. And this would work in reverse. I.e. the children could not
    steal the bloodline from the parents. They would gain nothing.

    However, grandpa better watch himself if little Johnny gets to be awful
    admiring of grandpa's divine aura. hehehe

    - -DKE

  5. #5
    Gary V. Foss
    Guest

    Children/Infanticide and bloodl

    Even Sørgjerd wrote:

    > I strongly disagree about the problem with several wives. It happens to be a
    > usual custom in several eastern cultures on this planet to marry several women.

    Try it sometime.

    Gary

  6. #6
    gingerprince
    Guest

    Children/Infanticide and bloodl

    >In a message dated 10-27-1998 10:58:08 PM Central Standard Time,
    >jknevitt@yahoo.com writes:
    >
    >> If you kill a blooded person with a blow to the heart, you get
    >> yourself some bloodline points. Sweet.
    >> Now, what's there to say a blooded character couldn't get himself a
    >> whole harem of blooded women (under duress) dedicated to producing
    >> children for him so he could kill them and steal their bloodpower when
    >> they're born ?
    >>
    >In my game, I'd rule that you can gain no additional blood power
    originally,
    >immediately derived from your own. In other words, the children got their
    >line from their parents, so the parents get nothing by killing their own
    kids
    >and stealing their bloodline, since it is derived from the parents,
    >themselves. And this would work in reverse. I.e. the children could not
    >steal the bloodline from the parents. They would gain nothing.
    >
    >However, grandpa better watch himself if little Johnny gets to be awful
    >admiring of grandpa's divine aura. hehehe
    >
    >-DKE


    Didn't the Gorgon try something like this a while back, have a bunch
    of children with human women, then when they matured and learnt to use their
    blood powers sent them out to cause trouble. I guess he planned to claim
    their bloodlines presumably enhanced by bloodthefts of their own.

    Isn't the Warlock of the Stonecrowns one of the Gorgon's progeny?
    He's pretty paranoid about the Gorgon coming after him, so I guess Old
    Stoney's plan worked in some way.

    Nick.

  7. #7
    Mark A Vandermeulen
    Guest

    Children/Infanticide and bloodl

    On Tue, 27 Oct 1998, James Knevitt wrote:

    > I) What happens when a blooded person and an unblooded person have a
    > child (I cant remember if this was in thge BR rulebook) ? I'm guessing
    > the child would have the blooded person's derivation but the strength
    > would be diluted (by about half) by the unblooded person.
    >
    > II) Here's an interesting dilemma:
    >
    > If you kill a blooded person with a blow to the heart, you get
    > yourself some bloodline points. Sweet.
    > Now, what's there to say a blooded character couldn't get himself a
    > whole harem of blooded women (under duress) dedicated to producing
    > children for him so he could kill them and steal their bloodpower when
    > they're born ?

    I've always played in the terms you indicated: the offspring of a blooded
    noble and an unblooded kitchen wench (or a blooded noble and an unblooded
    stablehand, although that is probably rarer in medieval cultures), is a
    blooded offspring with a one-step reduction in bloodline strength (minor
    to tainted, major to minor, etc), and half of the BL score of his blooded
    parent. Blooded bastards can be wonderful fun (particularly when you
    didn't even realize that you HAD a sister).

    As for BL-raising stables of wives, the Warlock of the Stonecrowns
    adventure mentions that this is exactly what the Gorgon did for a while.
    He captured a bunch of women to provide him with offspring, and ended up
    killing most of them (the Warlock so mentioned is one that escaped). If I
    recall correctly, his original purpose was to create lieutennants which
    are loyal to him, but he eventually decided that his offspring would not
    in fact be particularly loyal to him and would more likely be always
    looking to turn on him with half a chance, and so gave up the idea, but
    that in fact was the evenutal outcome. (I could be misremembering part of
    this, it's been a while.)

    Mark VanderMeulen
    vander+@pitt.edu

  8. #8
    DKEvermore@aol.co
    Guest

    Children/Infanticide and bloodl

    In a message dated 10-30-1998 4:19:06 AM Central Standard Time,
    gingerprince@easynet.co.uk writes:

    > Didn't the Gorgon try something like this a while back, have a bunch
    > of children with human women, then when they matured and learnt to use
    their
    > blood powers sent them out to cause trouble. I guess he planned to claim
    > their bloodlines presumably enhanced by bloodthefts of their own.
    >

    Correct. He did dabble with heirs (any via the Tara the Black Princess? who
    knows...) and establishing a dynasty for a time. It soon became clear to him
    that he would not die, and instead viewed his heirs as threats, challenges to
    his throne and killed them. Only the Warlock escaped alive.

    Clearly, this was not an attempt to harvest his own children for increased
    bloodline power, and no mention is made that he gained personally by it.
    Instead it was a simple removal of a possible threat to the claim of his own
    throne.

    > Isn't the Warlock of the Stonecrowns one of the Gorgon's progeny?
    > He's pretty paranoid about the Gorgon coming after him, so I guess Old
    > Stoney's plan worked in some way.
    >
    > Nick.
    >

    It worked in the sense that he found he could have children. But turned out
    to be a totally useless venture for him. The Warlock (who the Gorgon would
    have killed if he knew the Warlock's whereabouts and to get his stolen
    property back -- the cauldron) is paranoid worm, but paranoid with reason.

    - -DKE

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Children's Fair
    By Sorontar in forum Main
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-21-2008, 12:47 AM
  2. children of the light in BR
    By marcum uth mather in forum The Royal Library
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-05-2002, 10:44 AM
  3. Bloodtheft on your own children
    By Sivar Windlass in forum The Royal Library
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 12-16-2001, 06:31 AM
  4. Children/Infanticide and blood
    By Whalejudge@aol.co in forum MPGN Mailinglist archive 1996-1999
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-28-1998, 05:14 AM
  5. Children/Infanticide and bloodlines
    By James Knevitt in forum MPGN Mailinglist archive 1996-1999
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-28-1998, 04:52 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
BIRTHRIGHT, DUNGEONS & DRAGONS, D&D, the BIRTHRIGHT logo, and the D&D logo are trademarks owned by Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and are used by permission. ©2002-2010 Wizards of the Coast, Inc.