This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

- --part0_908828420_boundary
Content-ID:
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

Well said response. Thanks.

I happen to think your words are right, and that is more or less how I played
it out, taking into account the current campaign considerations of course. HTe
brunt comment is particularly appropriate.

Shadewulf

- --part0_908828420_boundary
Content-ID:
Content-type: message/rfc822
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-disposition: inline

Return-Path:
Received: from rly-za04.mx.aol.com (rly-za04.mail.aol.com [172.31.36.100]) by
air-za02.mail.aol.com (v50.21) with SMTP; Sun, 18 Oct 1998 23:50:33
-0400
Received: from phaser.Showcase.MPGN.COM (Phaser.Showcase.MPGN.COM
[206.66.87.5])
by rly-za04.mx.aol.com (8.8.8/8.8.5/AOL-4.0.0)
with ESMTP id XAA17796;
Sun, 18 Oct 1998 23:50:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost)
by phaser.Showcase.MPGN.COM (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id XAA25747;
Sun, 18 Oct 1998 23:33:30 -0400
Received: by lists.MPGN.COM (bulk_mailer v1.5); Sun, 18 Oct 1998 23:32:09
-0400
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
by phaser.Showcase.MPGN.COM (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA25721
for birthright-outgoing; Sun, 18 Oct 1998 23:32:03 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: phaser.Showcase.MPGN.COM: majordom set sender to
owner-birthright@lists.MPGN.COM using -f
Received: from Mithril.MPGN.COM (Mithril.MPGN.COM [206.66.87.8])
by phaser.Showcase.MPGN.COM (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA25712
for ; Sun, 18 Oct 1998 23:31:41 -0400
Received: from PRIME-FE1 (prime-fe1.lvcablemodem.com [24.234.0.9])
by Mithril.MPGN.COM (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id XAA25508
for ; Sun, 18 Oct 1998 23:31:39 -0400
Received: from kross - 24.234.8.108 by lvcablemodem.com with Microsoft
SMTPSVC;
Sun, 18 Oct 1998 20:34:10 -0700
Message-ID:
From: "Spyderz"
To:
Subject: Re: [BIRTHRIGHT] - A Question
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 1998 20:33:27 -0700
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3155.0
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0
Sender: owner-birthright@Phaser.ShowCase.MPGN.COM
Reply-To: birthright@MPGN.COM
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable


In response to your question about the UN thing...I can't imagine a countr=
y
in danger from a superior foe not agreeing to help to prevent their
downfall...at least not if they truly believed that they would fall withou=
t
help... especially if offered...As far as other NPC nations joining the
fight...I would only see them joining the fight if they believed that ther=
e
was a real chance of the other nation falling and them being next...and th=
en
only as little as possible as I would expect they would want other nations
to bear the brunt...leaving them in better position to deal with their
neighbors who helped later...

Thats my take...for what it's worth...


************************************************** ************************=
*
To unsubscribe from this list send mail to majordomo@mpgn.com with the lin=
e

- --part0_908828420_boundary--