Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12
  1. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Edinburgh, UK
    Posts
    190
    Downloads
    5
    Uploads
    0
    I think many people have toyed with the idea that province level is not directly related to population only, and some use that idea regularly. I think to a certain extent one will see some degree of this in all campaigns, but I'm not sure if separating population as a separate factor is necessarily the best way to go. If you say that the population will determine the maximum province level you are effectively preventing any economical or social improvements that could contribute to the increase in province wealth/level.

    I am also a bit sceptical to the artificial division of population based on the current realm boundaries. E.g. why should Ghoere have it's potential population increased because it conquers a low level province? The notion that each province have 4.5 province levels of people, but that more or less of these are ruled by the regent seems a bit forced to me.

  2. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    60
    Downloads
    8
    Uploads
    0
    I meant that to be used for the Region... I.E. The whole of Anuire... or Vosguard or Brechtur etc.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
BIRTHRIGHT, DUNGEONS & DRAGONS, D&D, the BIRTHRIGHT logo, and the D&D logo are trademarks owned by Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and are used by permission. ©2002-2010 Wizards of the Coast, Inc.