Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Taxes

  1. #1
    Gary V. Foss
    Guest

    Taxes

    >

    Actually, I don't think it is Law holdings that collect taxes. If we
    use our government as an example, we see that it is the bureacracy that
    collects taxes. The fraction of money actually collected by law
    holdings (in their role as enforcers of the taxation laws) is pretty
    small compared to the amount that is raked up by the tax collectors.
    The bureacracy is controlled by the province ruler rather than the law
    holder, so it is he that collects the lion's share of the taxes.

    Besides, the Rulebook talks about how the Law holder could attempt to
    garner taxes from the province itself, but normally this would make no
    sense because they are usually one and the same. If they are owned by
    two different regents, however, the law holder could try to garnish
    taxes from the province ruler. How could the Law holder do so if it
    were not the province itself that collected the taxes?

    - -Gary

  2. #2
    Tim Nutting
    Guest

    Taxes

    Is not the better example of tax collection that of the Roman Empire?
    There we see that a single individual within a township could bid for the
    right to collect taxes for the Empire based on an assessment of the tax
    value of a given community. The tax collector was not furnished any money
    for this deed, but there was no attention paid to how much he chose to line
    his pockets so long as the money made it to the government.

    We have to keep in mind that the peasantry and even some upper class
    nobility will not have very good communication. They do not have the
    access that we have to know what our tax dollars are going for, and the
    government could care less as to whether or not you can afford your taxes,
    they must be paid.

    I have no idea how long this trend continued in European history, but I
    suspect it migrated from a wealthy landowner to a titled noble in a given
    region, perhaps a knight of the realm or some such?

    Just some thoughts...

    Tim Nutting

  3. #3
    Jim Cooper
    Guest

    Taxes

    Tim Nutting wrote:
    > I have no idea how long this trend continued in European history, but I suspect it migrated from a wealthy landowner to a titled noble in a given region, perhaps a knight of the realm or some such?<

    That's right - in the feudal system, the landowners collected the money
    (well, ok, BR feudalism isn't exactly feudalism, but thats for another
    post). They also are responsible for holding court and dispensing the
    lord's justice to those who work their land.

    My point is that the law(yers) and the tax collectors are one and the
    same - those guys riding around in shiny suits baking their brains all
    day and beating themselves over the head with big sticks - dats them.
    Those guys are the law, plus its their responsibility to relay the taxes
    on up the line to the big bosses during the harvest season.

    So, Duatha has a point, in a certain fashion. Its just that normally,
    these guys would do the lawful thing and give the money to the province
    ruler (as per the rules). But, also, there is nothing saying they can't
    'creatively withhold' such funds either (as per the law claims rules).

    Cheers,
    Darren

  4. #4
    Gary V. Foss
    Guest

    Taxes

    Jim Cooper wrote:

    > That's right - in the feudal system, the landowners collected the money
    > (well, ok, BR feudalism isn't exactly feudalism, but thats for another
    > post). They also are responsible for holding court and dispensing the
    > lord's justice to those who work their land.
    >
    > My point is that the law(yers) and the tax collectors are one and the
    > same - those guys riding around in shiny suits baking their brains all
    > day and beating themselves over the head with big sticks - dats them.
    > Those guys are the law, plus its their responsibility to relay the taxes
    > on up the line to the big bosses during the harvest season.
    >
    > So, Duatha has a point, in a certain fashion. Its just that normally,
    > these guys would do the lawful thing and give the money to the province
    > ruler (as per the rules). But, also, there is nothing saying they can't
    > 'creatively withhold' such funds either (as per the law claims rules).

    This may be true, but their right to collect the taxes came from the guy who ruled. In BR terms, even if a law holding does collect all the gold (which I'm still not 100% convinced of) if they tried to
    keep it all, they'd be using their authority unlawfully, as a result the people would flip out and stop paying their taxes and the rightful ruler would actually support them. Sure, a sheriff or tax
    collector can skim plenty of the top (which there are already rules for in the game) but if a big amount of the gold doesn't get to the province ruler then they would get ousted pretty quickly.

    Gary

  5. #5
    Dom
    Guest

    Taxes

    >Darren wrote

    >So, Duatha has a point, in a certain fashion. Its just that normally,
    >these guys would do the lawful thing and give the money to the province
    >ruler (as per the rules). But, also, there is nothing saying they can't
    >'creatively withhold' such funds either (as per the law claims rules).


    In order for a regent to claim any taxes initially he or she must
    have invested a province, and ruled it up to a level where they are
    entitled to claim money at the severity they have declared. The
    infrastructure for claiming Taxes is (IMO) part of the hefty cost
    in GB of ruling up provinces in comparison to establishing law holdings.

    A law holder could using an Espionage action steal money from the
    province regent, and would be assisted by the level or his law holding
    making it easier. In addition if the law holder other than a regent
    is not supporting the regents levels of taxation then there may be
    a lot of unrest in the provinces affected.



    Dom
    - ---

    mailto:dominicreynolds@dial.pipex.com or mailto:dominicr@bigfoot.com

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Odp: TAXES - comment
    By Duatha in forum MPGN Mailinglist archive 1996-1999
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-23-1998, 10:03 AM
  2. TAXES - comment
    By Duatha in forum MPGN Mailinglist archive 1996-1999
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-22-1998, 02:38 PM
  3. Odp: TAXES
    By Duatha in forum MPGN Mailinglist archive 1996-1999
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-22-1998, 04:13 AM
  4. Re: Taxes
    By Lawrence David Ruiz in forum MPGN Mailinglist archive 1996-1999
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-21-1998, 08:08 PM
  5. Taxes
    By Duatha in forum MPGN Mailinglist archive 1996-1999
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-21-1998, 06:04 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
BIRTHRIGHT, DUNGEONS & DRAGONS, D&D, the BIRTHRIGHT logo, and the D&D logo are trademarks owned by Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and are used by permission. ©2002-2010 Wizards of the Coast, Inc.