View Poll Results: Should Chap 1 classes be sanctioned (except noble & magician)?

Voters
14. You may not vote on this poll
  • 1. Yes

    11 78.57%
  • 2. No

    1 7.14%
  • 3. Obstain

    2 14.29%
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Birthright Developer irdeggman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Virginia Beach, Virginia
    Posts
    3,946
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Based on comments from the 'other attempt' lets try it this way (in parallel).

    If the other vote does manage to show a clear majority then it will take precedence. I'm just trying to get something done.

    So let's try to buy it off in parts if necesary. Everything in the class sectin except for noble and magician which will be worked out later.

    Again, if you vote no please put in comments so we can see what needs to be worked on.

    Be careful with the null vote option, once it is checked you won't be able to vote.
    Duane Eggert

  2. #2
    Birthright Developer irdeggman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Virginia Beach, Virginia
    Posts
    3,946
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    here is the pdf version
    Attached Files Attached Files
    Duane Eggert

  3. #3
    Birthright Developer irdeggman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Virginia Beach, Virginia
    Posts
    3,946
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Here is the word version
    Attached Files Attached Files
    Duane Eggert

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    aberdeen, scotland
    Posts
    281
    Downloads
    87
    Uploads
    0
    It is quite difficult to settle upon a magician and noble class as they are created classes for the playtest and a lot of people have strong opinions on what they would like to see. I am happy enough with the old noble class and don't think that it needs any real work. I would like to see the magician get bonus general feats like the old noble instead of the special abilitys and spontanious casting to show their wider education and to enable people to specialize them to what their vision of a magician is. That said I have voted yes for everything bar the noble and magician.
    MORNINGSTAR

  5. #5
    Senior Member Osprey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Ashland, NH
    Posts
    1,377
    Downloads
    6
    Uploads
    0
    Graham,

    Which "old" noble are you referring to? The 3.0 BRCS one (with bonus feats every four levels but nothing else), or the Ranger-like first version for the 3.5 revision (with Wealth, Resources,Coordinate, etc.)?

    Osprey

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    aberdeen, scotland
    Posts
    281
    Downloads
    87
    Uploads
    0
    Graham,

    Which "old" noble are you referring to? The 3.0 BRCS one (with bonus feats every four levels but nothing else), or the Ranger-like first version for the 3.5 revision (with Wealth, Resources,Coordinate, etc.)?

    Osprey
    I was refering to the 3.0 brcs with the bonus feats. I don't like the ranger like one as I think that much of those benefits should come from roleplaying and that not every noble should get them.
    MORNINGSTAR

  7. #7
    Birthright Developer irdeggman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Virginia Beach, Virginia
    Posts
    3,946
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    All right I'm closing this poll.

    Here are the results:

    Should Chap 1 classes be sanctioned (except noble & magician)?
    1. Yes [ 11 ] [78.57%]
    2. No [ 1 ] [7.14%]
    3. Obstain [ 2 ] [14.29%]
    Total Votes: 14


    I now declare the class section of Chap 1 santioned (with the exception of noble and magician classes).

    And another and another one and another one bites the dust. . .
    Duane Eggert

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
BIRTHRIGHT, DUNGEONS & DRAGONS, D&D, the BIRTHRIGHT logo, and the D&D logo are trademarks owned by Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and are used by permission. ©2002-2010 Wizards of the Coast, Inc.