Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    159
    Downloads
    21
    Uploads
    0

    Contesting provinces

    Could someone *please* answer my question? You don't need to speak with
    great authority, any ideas will do :)

    >I have a question. The rules say that a province can be contested
    peacefully
    >if its loyalty is poor or rebellious. Now suppose that someone contests a
    >province, then the ruler agitates there so that the loyalty is improved to
    >average or high before the contesting regent can invest it. Does the
    >province stay contested? Can it still be invested?
    >
    ******************
    Aleksei Andrievski
    aka Solmyr, Archmage of the Azure Star
    Visit the Archmage's Tower at
    http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/Fortress/2198/index.html
    Join the Mystaran Birthright PBEM at the above website!

  2. #2
    veryfastperson@juno.com
    Guest

    Contesting provinces

    On Sat, 4 Jul 1998 11:33:19 +0300 "Aleksei Andrievski"
    writes:
    >Could someone *please* answer my question? You don't need to speak
    >with
    >great authority, any ideas will do :)
    >
    >>I have a question. The rules say that a province can be contested
    >peacefully
    >>if its loyalty is poor or rebellious. Now suppose that someone
    >contests a
    >>province, then the ruler agitates there so that the loyalty is
    >improved to
    >>average or high before the contesting regent can invest it. Does the
    >>province stay contested? Can it still be invested?

    Okay, since i think i know where this could have come from, i don't know
    how much weight my idea's will carry :)

    But about your question - I would say that the loyalty HAS to be
    rebellious to be invested peacefully. If the ruler of the province
    agitates it to poor or higher, it cannot be invested. Now, if it is
    contested then agitated, i would say that would be similar to contesting
    it back :) of course, the contesting regent could use some RP's to
    "anti-agitate".

    Just my thoughs, and a couple GB's
    - -Erik

    __________________________________________________ ___________________
    You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
    Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
    Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]

  3. #3
    David Sean Brown
    Guest

    Contesting provinces

    > >I have a question. The rules say that a province can be contested
    > peacefully
    > >if its loyalty is poor or rebellious. Now suppose that someone contests a
    > >province, then the ruler agitates there so that the loyalty is improved to
    > >average or high before the contesting regent can invest it. Does the
    > >province stay contested? Can it still be invested?

    I would have to say the the province is still contested because the ruling
    regent has done nothing to stop or counteract this action. Hwoever,
    befause the loyalty has been raised above poor, by the rules it cannot be
    invested peacefully.

    Sean

  4. #4
    James Ray
    Guest

    Contesting provinces

    - ----------
    > > >I have a question. The rules say that a province can be contested
    > > peacefullyif its loyalty is poor or rebellious.

    Actually, the rules say a province can be peacefully contested if its law
    holding is at (0) AND the province's loyalty is poor or rebellious. If the
    Law Holding in the Province isn't (0), the Province cant be peacefully
    invested.

    >Now suppose that someone contests a province, then the ruler >agitates
    there so that the loyalty is improved to average or high before >the
    contesting regent can invest it.

    It depends...is each action by each Regent successful? How do the two
    Regents and the Priest who is to perform Investiture compare to each other
    in the order of Domain Initiative?

    >Does the province stay contested? Can it still be invested?

    The Province, if successfully contested, generates no regency or GBs until:

    a) its ruler is divisted
    b) ends the Contest by creating a Law Holding
    c) increases the Provinces Loyalty

    In your example, the Regent Contesting rulership of the Province has
    succeeded, so, if he has a priest Regent ready to perform Investiture, he
    can attempt to Invest the Province during his next Action Round, as long as
    BOTH the contesting Regent AND the Priest Regent go before the current
    ruler in the order of Domain Initiative . If the Province's loyalty is
    rebellious, then an Agitate action alone wont suffice to keep the
    contesting Regent from trying again, though...
    >
    > I would have to say the the province is still contested because the
    ruling regent has done nothing to stop or counteract this action. Hwoever,
    befause the loyalty has been raised above poor, by the rules it cannot be
    invested peacefully.
    >
    > Sean
    Let me also add that the loyalty of the Province need not be raised "above
    poor"...raising it TO poor is enough to end the Contest, but the contesting
    Regent is still free to perform Contest again in the next Action Round. MY
    question about this scenario is wether this use of Contest destroys the Law
    (0) the current ruler controlled in the Province. I would assume so, or
    else Ruling the Law (0) to a Law (1) would end the contest, as well as the
    methods listed above.

    2) Does it leave the Province uncontrolled?

  5. #5
    bloebick@juno.com (Benja
    Guest

    Contesting provinces

    On Sat, 4 Jul 1998 11:33:19 +0300 "Aleksei Andrievski"
    writes:
    >Could someone *please* answer my question? You don't need to speak
    >with
    >great authority, any ideas will do :)
    >
    >>I have a question. The rules say that a province can be contested
    >peacefully
    >>if its loyalty is poor or rebellious. Now suppose that someone
    >contests a
    >>province, then the ruler agitates there so that the loyalty is
    >improved to
    >>average or high before the contesting regent can invest it. Does the
    >>province stay contested? Can it still be invested?
    >>

    OK. Here's my opinion, since the rules are not clear.

    If you contest a rebellious province, then the rulership reverts to no
    one (ie, the province is contested). It takes a Rule action for the
    regent to regain it. If the regent raises loyalty, then it makes it
    impossible to be contested again, but the regent can not collect RP or GB
    from the province until a Rule action is successful.

    Benjamin

    __________________________________________________ ___________________
    You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
    Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
    Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]

  6. #6
    Craig Mellare
    Guest

    Contesting provinces

    >>I have a question. The rules say that a province can be contested
    >peacefully
    >>if its loyalty is poor or rebellious. Now suppose that someone contests a
    >>province, then the ruler agitates there so that the loyalty is improved to
    >>average or high before the contesting regent can invest it. Does the
    >>province stay contested? Can it still be invested?

    Since the rules state that a successfully contested province remains
    contested until the ruler plays a successful rule action my answer would be
    yes to the first question and yes to the second.

    Craig

  7. #7
    James Ray
    Guest

    Contesting provinces

    Its not a Rule action that ends a Provincial Contest. The Province remains
    Contested until its current ruler is divested of the Proince, the current
    ruler successfully Creates a Law Holding, or the current ruler increases
    the Province's Loyalty. Succeeding a Rule action works to save Contested
    Holdings, not Provinces.

    - ----------
    > From: Craig Mellare
    > Since the rules state that a successfully contested province remains
    > contested until the ruler plays a successful rule action my answer would
    be
    > yes to the first question and yes to the second.
    >
    > Craig

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Contesting Holdings
    By A_dark in forum The Royal Library
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-13-2003, 01:23 PM
  2. Contesting provinces
    By Solmyr in forum MPGN Mailinglist archive 1996-1999
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-01-1998, 07:00 PM
  3. Contesting Castles?
    By Trizt in forum MPGN Mailinglist archive 1996-1999
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-04-1998, 01:26 PM
  4. Contesting Castles?
    By DKEvermore in forum MPGN Mailinglist archive 1996-1999
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-29-1998, 07:02 AM
  5. Contesting Castles?
    By Eric Dunn in forum MPGN Mailinglist archive 1996-1999
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 04-29-1998, 12:09 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
BIRTHRIGHT, DUNGEONS & DRAGONS, D&D, the BIRTHRIGHT logo, and the D&D logo are trademarks owned by Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and are used by permission. ©2002-2010 Wizards of the Coast, Inc.