Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Build-College

  1. #1
    The Olesen`s
    Guest

    Build-College

    One of my regent players, with the good of his people in mind, has
    decided to build a college is his capitol province (6). I decided that
    It would cost 20 GBs. I have not fully decided its effects. Ideas
    would be helpful.


    If it were open free to the public (public school) he would have to pay
    more GBs for it. I offered him these choices:
    Pay for all costs: Any class (as in social class) may go there
    Pay 1/2 costs: Middle class and up only
    Pay only minimal costs: Rich Middle and Upper only

    Maybee it makes more people literate?
    Raises the average intelligence?
    Increases sucess of attendants (better jobs)?

  2. #2
    Jonathan Picklesimer
    Guest

    Build-College

    On Sun, 3 May 1998, The Olesen's wrote:

    > If it were open free to the public (public school) he would have to pay
    > more GBs for it. I offered him these choices:
    > Pay for all costs: Any class (as in social class) may go there
    > Pay 1/2 costs: Middle class and up only
    > Pay only minimal costs: Rich Middle and Upper only

    If we want to be realistic, the concept of a "free public education" is
    really a new thing. In the medieval type setting in Birthright, it would
    have been unheard of. While there are great benefits to a public
    education, increased literacy, and the like, there are also some distinct
    drawbacks. People who can read typically start reading things that the
    government would really not have them read. When the university
    professors are writing treatises on the injustice of a totalitarian state
    and no one can read them, except for a few other professors who can agree
    and pat the author on the back, then there is little danger. If things
    get rolling along too well, a few well placed executions, and things
    settle down for another generation or so. However, when the masses can
    read these writings and start buying into them, it gets very hard to
    control your government.

    I would lean toward the idea that a univeristy education is for the high
    middle and upper classes only. It should be quite expensive and very time
    consuming. Getting an education requires a large amount of leisure time.
    By that I mean that you cannot be worried about being attacked by orogs,
    or even partcipating in the gathering of food. It is very much an
    aristocratic endeavor.

    > Maybee it makes more people literate?

    A university does very little for the literacy rate. Elementary schools
    raise the literacy rate, well at least in theory. Universities contribute
    the creation of the philosophical ideas needed to advance the
    civilization. Things like mathematics, physics, chemistry, literature,
    political thought, historical analysis, the development of business and
    economic theory, medicine all happen at the university level. Do not
    underestimate the impact of literature and mathematics on a society.

    > Raises the average intelligence?

    Not by a long shot. Think about how prevalent a college education is
    today. Are the recipients of the knowledge any more intelligent? No.
    Better informed? Hopefully. Better thinkers? If we are lucky.

    > Increases sucess of attendants (better jobs)?

    That is a distinct possibility. As a case in point, one of the biggest
    arguments presented in studying the history of man is so that we can
    identify patterns of behavior that have occured in our history, and
    hopefully avoid those patterns which led to harm, and repeat those
    patterns that led to success. Hopefully, an educated ambassador would
    make fewer mistakes than an uneducated one.

    Also, we need to make a distinction between a college and a university.
    The main emphasis of a college is instruction. The main emphasis of a
    university is research. That is not to say that some research does not
    occur at a college and that teaching does not occur at a university. The
    bardic colleges are more interested in teaching folks how to be good bards
    than they are with the creation of a new bardic knowledge or the
    development of socio-political theories on the impact of bards on society.
    A univeristy during this time would be training the best minds - i.e.
    those who can afford it, if you are rich, you must be smart otherwise you
    could have never amassed your fortune - in how to research and evaluate
    new ideas. Early universities were a hot bed for the sciences, medicine,
    and history.

    I think that the university would be most beneficial in helping the
    development of technology. Any domain action that centers on developing a
    technolgy, improving the understanding of science and nature, making
    better weapons of war, improving an acadmic skill of a regent, should all
    get bonuses to their success roll, provided that your university has folks
    working in that area. I also think that a university could add bonuses to
    diplomatic actions, depending upon how you use the faculty of the
    university as resources.

    What items get bonuses largely depends upon the emphasis of your
    university. If you develop a leading school in history, your diplomacy
    actions should be much more likely to succeed. If you have a lot of
    mathematics and science being investigated, then you will be more likely
    to make technological improvements that advance society. Be careful that
    you do not allow your regent to make a university that is great at
    everything. It costs the state a great deal of money to hire the faculty,
    and build the resources needed to make an exceptional department in a
    university. Your university should start out with only one really good
    department. As years pass, that department gets stronger, and becomes
    even more famous. Then other people want to go to work at that university
    just to be associated with the name, and eventually you start to grow
    other really strong departments. It takes lots of time though.

    Also realize that your university students are going to be the first to
    start social change. Your regent must keep your eye on them and make sure
    that they do not get out of hand. Young folks have a lot of energy and
    not much wisdom. I am sorry, but it is true. University students usually
    do things that they wind up regretting later in life. So, it may be very
    likely that your university students may cause a riot from time to time
    like we saw at Michigan State this past week. That does not mean that the
    government should shut the university, or destroy the student rebels. It
    does not mean that the government should not watch them closely either.

    I could ramble on quite a bit more, but I think that I have given you a
    lot to think about. Have fun with it. Make sure that your regenr's
    coffers get hit heavily on the construction of the university and then
    continues to take fairly significant hits as he has to develop the
    library, faculty, and staff of the place. Research is expensive and time
    consuming, but it adds greatly to the society in the end.

    Just my 2 GBs
    Jonathan

  3. #3
    Jonathan Picklesimer
    Guest

    Build-College

    Another small point about your university that I had forgotten.

    In the middle ages the universities had a very strong theological
    component. This made sense in light of the fact taht many were studying
    science and history in order to better understand God and the universe.
    It also made sense in light of the fact that the church had access to vast
    bodies of knowledge and her clergy were, mostly, literate - i.e. they
    could read Latin. So the clergy was a natural place to find literate
    teachers with a desire to ask and answer questions.

    So, one of the local churches may help sponsor the university. They may
    have members of the clergy who are quite learned and interested in helping
    out. It is also a way for these clergymen to gain access to new converts.
    The church of Avani and of Rournil both should have some pretty serious
    academic types. Avani's clergy would be interested in mathematics,
    and philosophy (see the Cities of the Sun expansion and the Ariya
    DSB). Rournil's clergy would be happy to discuss the mysteries of
    meighval, as well as religion, philosophy, and geography. Clergy from the
    temples of Eric, the god of nature, would be good biology/chemistry type
    folks. Cuiracen and Andurias clergy may be interested in political
    science, contemporary histroy, ancient history, and physics. Eleole and
    Sera may be interested in business, economics, early psychology
    issues, government, and law. Nesirie's clergy may be
    interested in mathematics, ancient history, astronomy, physics,
    oceanography, and geography. Belenik and Kreishna? Hard to say. I don't
    see there being too many academic types in these harsh religions. If
    there were, I could see the nature of magic, social policy and law,
    meteorology, biology, and medicine/anatomy (all the more effective to kill
    you with).

    Goodness knows there would be some lively debate going on between
    Nesiere and Andurias on history -- the god of Lawful War and the goddess
    of Mourning would probably see differently on several of the past events.
    You should have enough different views of the catastrophe at Desimaar to
    fill a library by itself. I think that Ariya and possibly Khourane have
    done quite a bit of work on mathematics.

    Also, as a side view, many times the only place to study the sciences and
    engineering were at military schools. Evariste Galois, a brilliant young
    French mathematician, was never able to get his PhD in Mathematics because
    he could not get into the Military Academy - an attitude problem.

    jsp

  4. #4
    bloebick@juno.com (Benja
    Guest

    Build-College

    On Sun, 03 May 1998 17:39:29 -0400 "The Olesen's"
    writes:
    >One of my regent players, with the good of his people in mind, has
    >decided to build a college is his capitol province (6). I decided
    >that
    >It would cost 20 GBs. I have not fully decided its effects. Ideas
    >would be helpful.
    >
    >
    >If it were open free to the public (public school) he would have to
    >pay
    >more GBs for it. I offered him these choices:
    > Pay for all costs: Any class (as in social class) may go there
    > Pay 1/2 costs: Middle class and up only
    > Pay only minimal costs: Rich Middle and Upper only
    >
    >Maybee it makes more people literate?
    >Raises the average intelligence?
    >Increases sucess of attendants (better jobs)?

    It might raise the loyalty some, but chances are educated people would be
    wiser people, and have lower loyalty if the regent does something bad or
    questionable.

    I also think it might increase the success of all agitate actions (for or
    against the ruler) since the people would understand more logical
    arguments.

    The school could also improve research chances when researching realm
    spells or some esoteric knowledge for other reasons.

    Benjamin

    __________________________________________________ ___________________
    You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
    Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
    Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]

  5. #5
    Ryan B. Caveney
    Guest

    Build-College

    On Mon, 4 May 1998, Benjamin W Loebick wrote:

    > I also think it might increase the success of all agitate actions (for or
    > against the ruler) since the people would understand more logical
    > arguments.

    *grin* Oh dear. My experiences in grad school incline me to
    think that logic is not so much better understood in a university
    setting, but rather more effectively abused.
    But seriously, what must be pointed out is that agitate actions
    to be successful must affect a majority of the population of the province,
    nearly all of whom will not derive any personal educational benefit from
    the university. And then, even in a modern, highly-educated society like
    the United States, how much is logic a factor in large-scale politics?
    Moral issues (which university education has notoriously minimized, even
    during the Middle Ages) and emotional appeals seem much more common, and
    indeed more effective -- it seems to me like most politicians would prefer
    their consituents to avoid critical thinking, as logic motivates and
    arms people to look for flaws in their arguments.

    > The school could also improve research chances when researching realm
    > spells or some esoteric knowledge for other reasons.

    Well, this is largely a matter of who's on the faculty. Given the
    paucity of learned people and books to learn from in a society without
    much leisure time and the printing press, it seems to me like the way to
    acquire such a faculty is by recruiting lieutenants who are sages of
    various fields; a court wizard would certainly be interested in having his
    liege finance such a college, as long as he got to be the dean. =)

    - --Ryan

  6. #6
    Ryan B. Caveney
    Guest

    Build-College

    On Mon, 4 May 1998, Benjamin W Loebick wrote:

    > I also think it might increase the success of all agitate actions (for or
    > against the ruler) since the people would understand more logical
    > arguments.

    *grin* Oh dear. My experiences in grad school incline me to
    think that logic is not so much better understood in a university
    setting, but rather more effectively abused.
    But seriously, what must be pointed out is that agitate actions
    to be successful must affect a majority of the population of the province,
    nearly all of whom will not derive any personal educational benefit from
    the university. And then, even in a modern, highly-educated society like
    the United States, how much is logic a factor in large-scale politics?
    Moral issues (which university education has notoriously minimized, even
    during the Middle Ages) and emotional appeals seem much more common, and
    indeed more effective -- it seems to me like most politicians would prefer
    their consituents to avoid critical thinking, as logic motivates and
    arms people to look for flaws in their arguments.

    > The school could also improve research chances when researching realm
    > spells or some esoteric knowledge for other reasons.

    Well, this is largely a matter of who's on the faculty. Given the
    paucity of learned people and books to learn from in a society without
    much leisure time and the printing press, it seems to me like the way to
    acquire such a faculty is by recruiting lieutenants who are sages of
    various fields; a court wizard would certainly be interested in having his
    liege finance such a college, as long as he got to be the dean. =)

    - --Ryan

  7. #7
    Tim Nutting
    Guest

    Build-College

    I have just come out of an intense ethics argument with another
    player/character in a game and have something of a general
    complaint/statement.

    I commonly see (and hear) the term "lets be realistic", or "to be
    realistic" followed by references to medieval Europe. In my ethics
    argument above I was told by the other player (a major pain in the butt
    rules lawyer) that my character could not have an enlightened sense of
    justice and innocence. After all, guilt was an assumed principal in many
    cases in medieval Europe, and the American ideal of Innocence until guilt
    is proven can not exist, so I wasn't playing my character realistically.

    My gripe: The whole concept has nothing to do with realism. Realism is
    another aspect of suspension of disbelief and the general feel of a game.
    To use Earth historical references against Birthright and call an attitude
    of convention "realistic" because it did/did not happen in Europe is not
    accurate. The word is misplaced and misleading.

    Jonathan Piclesimer (Jon - this isn't a flame or a slam - o.k.?) is correct
    in that state sponsored education for the public man is new in our world
    history. However, this is an historical fact and has little to do with
    weather or not the idea is plausible in Birthright.

    Education for the masses has not always been available, but education
    certainly was not the purview of the rich in Europe. The Church and the
    Holy Roman Empire sponsored the education of its clergymen, and to some
    degree, these clerics saw to the education of their followers.

    Obviously the Anuirean culture is modeled on late medieval/early
    renaissance England/France/Spain, the adherence to nobility is still a
    major issue for them, and of the four tribes, the Anuirean people are least
    likely to desire education for the masses if we are to follow the
    historical example. I don't think Anuire wants an educated public that is
    by default desirous of self-rule rather than the stark dichotomy of
    haves/have-nots that presently exists.

    Brechtur and Khinasi are very likely to support the idea of public
    education. The nobles have virtually no power at all in the Great Bay, and
    the Khinasi are almost as cosmopolitan as it gets.

    Now - what does a college do?

    Primarily I don't think that a regent is going to see an immediate return
    on his investment. The people are not going to be any more loyal (the U.S.
    educated 1/3 to 1/2 of the world's most brilliant terrorists).

    It could certainly serve as a tool for propaganda. After all history is
    only what is written in the books. Some of the biggest hoaxes have
    happened because a certain event "had no merit" and so did not happen.
    Then again who protested at Tieneman Square in the 80s? Students - the
    educated.

    A society can benefit from education, the more people that know about the
    value of sanitation the better, the more people learn about farming
    improvements the more food is produced.

    In all I guess I really don't see any hard game effect that could be reaped
    from educating the public. Just as many handicaps appear as benefits.
    Mostly its just a waste of time as you breed independence of a divorce of
    reliance upon the feudal structure.

    Just my few thousand gold pieces

    Tim Nutting

  8. #8
    The Olesen`s
    Guest

    Build-College

    Perhaps the attendants could be taught in a manner to favor the regent.
    Better chance for friendly Agitate? Lower for enemy?

  9. #9
    Gary V. Foss
    Guest

    Build-College

    Tim Nutting wrote:

    > My gripe: The whole concept has nothing to do with realism. Realism is
    > another aspect of suspension of disbelief and the general feel of a game.
    > To use Earth historical references against Birthright and call an attitude
    > of convention "realistic" because it did/did not happen in Europe is not
    > accurate. The word is misplaced and misleading.

    Hear, hear! I've had similar conversations with people before regarding the
    nature of role-playing and realism. After all, we play a game in which a
    halfling fighter can face off with a dragon, so a call for realism seems kind
    of silly, doesn't it? I mean, I play D&D to avoid reality, for cryin' out
    loud.

    I think RPG "realism" should be much more along the lines of movie "realism."
    If it contributes to the story line and makes things go along smoothly, then I
    say it's realistic.

    > Jonathan Piclesimer (Jon - this isn't a flame or a slam - o.k.?) is correct
    > in that state sponsored education for the public man is new in our world
    > history. However, this is an historical fact and has little to do with
    > weather or not the idea is plausible in Birthright.

    History is problematic when applied to RPGs. Aside from the fact that the
    campaign worlds are vastly different from that of the RW, we also have to deal
    with the addition of strange races, monsters, gods, and the existence of
    magic. Even the limited magic of BR would vastly change the nature of the
    societies and cultures that use it.

    Jonathan's description, however, was excellent and I found it very
    interesting. As an example, I think that description could be quite useful.
    Unfortunately, we haven't much to work with aside from examples from history.
    Such examples, however, should be taken with a grain of salt, not only because
    they may not really fit into a campaign world, but because the influences that
    created them differ greatly from those that would exist in the campaign world.

    The influence of the church on universities is a pretty good example of this.
    The Church was a colossal organization during the Renaissance. It had a huge
    influence on universities. That influence came about not only because of the
    size of the Church but because it was the bastion of learning in the centuries
    before the Renaissance after the fall of the Roman Empire blah, blah, blah when
    monastic orders preserved knowledge that most of the world didn't have time
    for. In the RW the Church was imbedded in learning.

    The temples in the BR setting don't have this same level of influence. First,
    their fractious. Temples that worship the same god don't even agree with one
    another. In fact, they compete against one another. A temple could still have
    quite a bit to do with a university, but I don't see it happening the same way
    it did in the RW.

    > Obviously the Anuirean culture is modeled on late medieval/early
    > renaissance England/France/Spain, the adherence to nobility is still a
    > major issue for them, and of the four tribes, the Anuirean people are least
    > likely to desire education for the masses if we are to follow the
    > historical example. I don't think Anuire wants an educated public that is
    > by default desirous of self-rule rather than the stark dichotomy of
    > haves/have-nots that presently exists.

    > In all I guess I really don't see any hard game effect that could be reaped
    > from educating the public. Just as many handicaps appear as benefits.
    > Mostly its just a waste of time as you breed independence of a divorce of
    > reliance upon the feudal structure.

    Well, one big difference between BR and the RW is the existence of bloodlines.
    In the RW the rulers supposedly had their station by divine right. In BR, they
    really do. They have the blood of the gods running through them. Because of
    this blood they can use the beliefs, support, etc. of the people in the form of
    RPs to get things done more effectively than a non-blooded RW ruler would.

    An educated person could have all kinds of philosophical reasons to oppose a
    dictatorship, but if that same dictator has a Divine Aura about him and could
    rule much more effectively due to their bloodline, even Professor Protester is
    going to have to admit their are pragmatic reasons to leave things as they are.

    - -Gary

  10. #10
    The Olesen`s
    Guest

    Build-College

    Trizt wrote:
    >
    > On 03-May-98, The Olesen's (olesens@bellatlantic.net) wrote about [BIRTHRIGHT]
    > - Build-College:
    >
    > ->It would cost 20 GBs. I have not fully decided its effects. Ideas
    > ->would be helpful.
    > I hope that is the cost to build the College and equip it with a small library
    > and nothing more.

    Of course. THis includes only the physical items. THings such as
    teachers, admisistartion, janatorial (sp the guys who sweep), etc. A
    larger library would also cost more.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Imperial College
    By Sorontar in forum Main
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-24-2010, 01:35 AM
  2. Build
    By Sorontar in forum Main
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-09-2009, 11:51 AM
  3. College of Magic
    By Sorontar in forum Main
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-19-2008, 02:53 AM
  4. Awnshegh Build
    By irdeggman in forum BRCS 3.0/3.5 Edition
    Replies: 50
    Last Post: 07-22-2004, 05:40 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
BIRTHRIGHT, DUNGEONS & DRAGONS, D&D, the BIRTHRIGHT logo, and the D&D logo are trademarks owned by Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and are used by permission. ©2002-2010 Wizards of the Coast, Inc.