Results 1 to 1 of 1
Thread: RE: Birthright - Castles
-
04-15-1998, 02:29 PM #1Harding Nick MMUkGuest
RE: Birthright - Castles
> >Correct. All holdings are considered fortified, yes. However, when
> a
> >Castle is built, the owning regents holdings are all inside the same
> >fortification. They are not considered to be fortified individually
> >(although this can be done).
>
> Ahh now I understand. It's just in this case the castle was built to
> protect a road into the province where as the law holdings (courts and
> watchhouses etc) are in the largest town and the temple is a monastry
> in the country.
> So in this case the castle does not actually fortify the associated
> holdings. I just didn't understand the logic behind the rule. thanks
>
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Birthright using Castles and Crusades rules
By Tannen in forum The Royal LibraryReplies: 1Last Post: 11-21-2006, 03:48 PM -
Birthright - Castles
By ispa in forum MPGN Mailinglist archive 1996-1999Replies: 2Last Post: 04-15-1998, 07:43 PM -
RE: Birthright - Castles
By Mark A Vandermeulen in forum MPGN Mailinglist archive 1996-1999Replies: 0Last Post: 04-15-1998, 12:29 PM -
RE: Birthright - Castles
By Harding Nick MMUk in forum MPGN Mailinglist archive 1996-1999Replies: 0Last Post: 04-15-1998, 09:43 AM -
Birthright - Castles
By ispa in forum MPGN Mailinglist archive 1996-1999Replies: 3Last Post: 04-12-1998, 09:40 AM
Bookmarks