Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: The battlefield

  1. #1
    jonathan.w.ingram@exgate
    Guest

    The battlefield

    I'm sure this has come up before, but does TSR have any plans to modify the
    battle rules to account for flank and rear attacks? How does everyone else
    handle flank and rear attacks?

    Jonathan

  2. #2
    Phil Burge
    Guest

    The battlefield

    I would also like to know how flank and rear attacks are run in
    everybody elses campaign. At the moment I don't use them, however I
    think it would be better if they were included as recently battles in my
    campaign have been coming down almost exclusively to numbers (and there
    has been some epic battles between Roesone and Ghoere, and between a
    thief regent (defending Medoere) against Diemed.

    Phil.

  3. #3
    RKK667
    Guest

    The battlefield

    Phil Burge wrote:

    > At the moment I don't use them, however I think it would be better if they
    > were included as recently battles in my
    > campaign have been coming down almost exclusively to numbers (and there has
    > been some epic battles between Roesone and Ghoere, and between a thief regent
    > (defending Medoere) against Diemed.

    Defending eh?Well that was how it started I'll give you that :-)I personally
    like the idea of rear attacks , not neccessarily flanking though.
    What I was wondering; is anyone using rules that stop cavalry units from
    retreating then charging in the same turn? {ie. get attacked by Infantry so
    they back off and then in their move charge in}.
    I realise that horse would be able to charge from the 25metres or however far a
    'square' on the battlefield is, but it just seems to happen all the time.
    hmmm
    Must buy more pikemen.
    Also, anyone know of any weaknessess of attacking Cerilian Dragons that can be
    exploited by a wittle thief?
    meow.

    -

  4. #4
    Bronwyn & David Evans
    Guest

    The battlefield

    - -----Original Message-----
    From: Kyle Foster
    To: birthright@MPGN.COM
    Date: Saturday, 21 March 1998 21:52
    Subject: Re: [BIRTHRIGHT] - The battlefield
    >
    > Those are my thoughts on the subject for whatever they are worth.
    >Incidently since I mentioned Pendragon I have found it and several of
    >its source books to be great source matarial for the make up and
    >functions of a court.
    >
    I agree with the usefullness of some of the pendragon books especially
    lordly domains.

    Cheers
    Trusylver

    http://free.prohosting.com/~trusylvr/

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Chap 6 - Should units be allowed to stack on the battlefield?
    By irdeggman in forum BRCS 3.0/3.5 Edition
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 04-24-2008, 04:50 AM
  2. The Battlefield
    By Rowan in forum The Royal Library
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 04-14-2008, 06:12 AM
  3. PCs on the Battlefield (honor and disgrace)
    By Birthright-L in forum The Royal Library
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-08-2004, 08:30 PM
  4. Charging On The Battlefield
    By MJH in forum The Royal Library
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-04-2004, 06:04 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
BIRTHRIGHT, DUNGEONS & DRAGONS, D&D, the BIRTHRIGHT logo, and the D&D logo are trademarks owned by Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and are used by permission. ©2002-2010 Wizards of the Coast, Inc.