Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Vampires Domain

  1. #1
    TOMMY.ASHTON@ASU.Ed
    Guest

    Vampires Domain

    List,
    I have in my a campaign a warlord of a united Rohrmarch. He has
    since invaded the Vampire's Domain to the North. In the Blood Enemies
    source book the map of the Vampire's Domain (positions of the provinces) is
    different in respect to the Brecht Sourcebook that was published later.
    Which one would be considered canonical?
    Thanks,
    T

  2. #2
    Darkstar
    Guest

    Vampires Domain

    TOMMY.ASHTON@ASU.Edu wrote:
    >
    > List,
    > I have in my a campaign a warlord of a united Rohrmarch. He has
    > since invaded the Vampire's Domain to the North. In the Blood Enemies
    > source book the map of the Vampire's Domain (positions of the provinces) is
    > different in respect to the Brecht Sourcebook that was published later.
    > Which one would be considered canonical?

    I hadn't noticed that before.

    It doesn't really make a lot of difference which one you use, but I
    would use the one in the Haven's of the Great Bay. It is much easier to
    read.

    - --
    Ian Hoskins

    e-Mail: hoss@box.net.au
    ICQ: 2938300
    Home Page: http://www.box.net.au/~hoss/birth.html

    From the Darkness we came,
    and to the Darkness we will return.

  3. #3
    Ed Stark
    Guest

    Vampires Domain

    At 10:47 AM 10/16/97 -0700, you wrote:
    > I have in my a campaign a warlord of a united Rohrmarch. He has
    >since invaded the Vampire's Domain to the North. In the Blood Enemies
    >source book the map of the Vampire's Domain (positions of the provinces) is
    >different in respect to the Brecht Sourcebook that was published later.
    >Which one would be considered canonical?

    Definitely use the material from HAVENS--and not just because I wrote it
    ;-). The material in BE was always intended to be sketchy and somewhat
    legendary. The Vampire's Hold is a nasty, spooky place, and reports out of
    it aren't always reliable.
    If you look at many of the other maps of awnshegh realms in BE--not to
    mention descriptions of the awnsheghlien themselves--you'll find
    discrepencies. That is, about 8 times out of 10 (sorry for the other two),
    intentional.


    Ed Stark
    Game Designer, Wizards of the Coast/TSR Division
    Asst. Brand Manager, BIRTHRIGHT/GREYHAWK/MARVEL Group
    TSR Website: http://www.tsrinc.com

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Chapter five/Ruling a domain/Adjusting domain attitude
    By Sorontar in forum Birthright Campaign Setting 3.5
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-13-2014, 07:40 AM
  2. Chapter five/Ruling a domain/Domain action rounds
    By Sinister in forum BRWiki Discussions
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-26-2007, 10:27 PM
  3. Vampires, And The Dark Blood
    By teloft in forum The Royal Library
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-08-2003, 06:36 PM
  4. Vampires hold
    By Finnsson in forum MPGN Mailinglist archive 1996-1999
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-14-1997, 03:23 PM
  5. BR Vampires
    By nlangle in forum MPGN Mailinglist archive 1996-1999
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-13-1997, 10:31 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
BIRTHRIGHT, DUNGEONS & DRAGONS, D&D, the BIRTHRIGHT logo, and the D&D logo are trademarks owned by Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and are used by permission. ©2002-2010 Wizards of the Coast, Inc.