Questions...Round 2

[David Sean Brown]

> 1. If a province(3) has no law holdings, who upholds the law in the province? What
> does it mean to have no law holdings?

Depends on the game..some games play you need law holdings to collect
provincial tax (not an official rule as far as I can see) In Role playing
terms, there is no law at all in that province..the regent basically has
no control over activities and the people are unprotectd until something
changes.

>
> 2. If a province(3) has a law(1) ruled by another regent, what does this mean?

The other regent can collect money from the guilds and temples income as
per the rules...other s play the other regent can also tax the provinceas
if he/she owned it.


Sean

[Tripp Elliott]

Morten Helles wrote:
>
> James Abbiati wrote:
> > 2. If a province(3) has a law(1) ruled by another regent, what does
> > this mean?
>
> It means that two people control the law in the province :) This might
> make things a bit confusing for the people living in the province! But
> usually one of the law holdings represents the underworld (mafia...) or
> a rebel ruler, and the other law holding represents the REAL regent,
> i.e. the province ruler. Furthermore, law holdings can be used to tax
> guilds and temples AND to block the province ruler's tax collections.

Nope, only one controls the law, and unfortunately, it's not the
province ruler.

Tripp