Results 11 to 20 of 29
Thread: Birthright Adventures
-
01-21-2002, 05:30 PM #11
- Join Date
- Jan 2002
- Location
- Ohio
- Posts
- 5
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
Are there any new BR computer games? Gorgon's Alliance was good. It seems all the new computer games have bugs and patches to find to fix. Wish they would let me playtest a few then the bugs would all be known and fixed before marketing.
One can only wait and doBring it on!
-
01-22-2002, 02:09 AM #12Orginally posted by MarcIDMT
Are there any new BR computer games? Gorgon's Alliance was good.Servant of the Most High,
Lawgiver
Isaiah 1:17
Learn to do good; Seek justice, Rebuke the oppressor; Defend the fatherless, Plead for the widow.
-
01-22-2002, 03:24 AM #13
- Join Date
- Jan 2002
- Location
- Mesa
- Posts
- 25
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
It came out in a time when PC RPG were dead, and it was buggy.
I think if Birthright got a graphics upgraded, unbuggied, and updated for the year 2002...it would be a huge hit.Ken 'Ulairi' Johnson
Associate Editor, IGN Vault Network
http://rpgvault.ign.com
http://www.ign.com
-
01-22-2002, 03:49 AM #14
I've never played Gorgon's Alliance. Not worth it?
-
01-22-2002, 04:28 AM #15Orginally posted by Sellenus
I've never played Gorgon's Alliance. Not worth it?Servant of the Most High,
Lawgiver
Isaiah 1:17
Learn to do good; Seek justice, Rebuke the oppressor; Defend the fatherless, Plead for the widow.
-
01-22-2002, 06:42 AM #16
- Join Date
- Jan 2002
- Location
- Mesa
- Posts
- 25
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
It's a great TBS. The Dungeon Crawls aren't very good, but it's there for a change of pace.
Ken 'Ulairi' Johnson
Associate Editor, IGN Vault Network
http://rpgvault.ign.com
http://www.ign.com
-
01-22-2002, 10:25 AM #17
-
01-24-2002, 09:53 PM #18
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
- Location
- Peace River, Alberta
- Posts
- 52
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
-
04-02-2004, 01:00 PM #19
----- Original Message -----
From: "irdeggman" <brnetboard@BIRTHRIGHT.NET>
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 5:32 AM
> Changing a core class that was a shared core class (that is a
> core class of the core rules and a core class of the BR setting
> (from 2nd ed)) is outside of the scope of this project.
Had the original creators of BR used this guiding principle we would not
have the Magician clas, would not have changed a core race, elimintated
gnomes, eliminated the use of priests for elves, altered the core equipment
list, or made other kinds of changes.
If the consensus of the BR community is to make a change to the core rules,
well, isn`t that *exactly* what setting material does. Otherwise why even
bother with a CS and get right on to the atlas, listing everything according
to the core rules? I fully understand that one may not regard twelve voters
as representative of anything, but that`s a different issue.
Kenneth Gauck
kgauck@mchsi.com
-
04-02-2004, 01:34 PM #20
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
- Location
- Virginia Beach, Virginia
- Posts
- 3,945
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
Originally posted by kgauck@Apr 2 2004, 08:00 AM
----- Original Message -----
From: "irdeggman" <brnetboard@BIRTHRIGHT.NET>
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 5:32 AM
> Changing a core class that was a shared core class (that is a
> core class of the core rules and a core class of the BR setting
> (from 2nd ed)) is outside of the scope of this project.
Had the original creators of BR used this guiding principle we would not
have the Magician clas, would not have changed a core race, elimintated
gnomes, eliminated the use of priests for elves, altered the core equipment
list, or made other kinds of changes.
If the consensus of the BR community is to make a change to the core rules,
well, isn`t that *exactly* what setting material does. Otherwise why even
bother with a CS and get right on to the atlas, listing everything according
to the core rules? I fully understand that one may not regard twelve voters
as representative of anything, but that`s a different issue.
Kenneth Gauck
kgauck@mchsi.com
The magician class wasn't a change to a core class it was a new class. A concept that is more fully embraced via the 3/3.5 mechanics (that is creating new classes).
Having elves not being priests was likewise not a change to the core classes.
The point I was making was that the paladin was a 'core' 2nd ed class and was a 'core' BR 2nd class.
Paladin is a 'core' 3rd/3.5 ed class and there is no reason not to take a stance that it shouldn't be a 'core' 3.5 BR class.
Again - my resistance to including the option of a paladin as a prestige class is based on the context in which people have posted their reasons for using prestige classes for paladins. They (generally) did not have anything to do with the BR campaign specifically, they had to do with people who didn't like the concept of a paladin - most common stance was the use of a Holy Warrior type of class instead.Duane Eggert
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks