Results 1 to 1 of 1
09-12-2003, 03:17 AM #1
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eosin the Red" <Eosin_the_Red@COX.NET>
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 10:39 PM
> AD&D had an assumption of equal or near equal non-combat skills
> of level - that is Rogr Algondier had a boatload of skills even though he
> was low level because level did not have much of a factor on skills
> especially when everyone (by and large) is restricted to the lower levels.
My own solution is to give these characters non-adventuring class levels
sufficient to my own estimation of how many character levels they should
> In 3E, skill and savvy (realm feats like Regent Focus or leadership type
> feats) are directly tied to the level and class(s) of a character.
In terms fo realm savvy, many fewer levels of political classes will match
fighter or cleric levels of greater number.
> FREX: Daeric Mhoried under 3E or 3.5 will never even be on par with realms
> like Ghoere, Avan, and Boeruine. Those leaders are all 9th level and have
> Warcraft and Lead as class skills.
I`d be inclined to make the Mhor a 2nd Aristocrat/5th Ranger, or a 3 A/ 4 R,
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)