Results 31 to 40 of 58
-
06-10-2003, 07:49 PM #31
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
- Location
- Virginia Beach, Virginia
- Posts
- 3,945
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
Originally posted by ryancaveney
I think my personal choice for the method I`ll be using IMC is a
combination of things Kenneth and Starfox have said which aren`t in "the
proposals " -- the DM assigns the blood scores he wants you to have,
and then you pick blood abilities based on your assigned score. The end.
Ryan Caveney
Duane Eggert
-
06-10-2003, 09:50 PM #32
At 01:02 PM 6/10/2003 -0400, Daniel McSorley wrote:
>The blood abilities are not effective on a domain level, nor should they
>be. They work on the adventuring level, and that`s where the balance
>needs to be. There are effectively two levels of game going on.
A couple blood abilities are effective at the domain level. Most notably
Battlewise and Courage, but other blood abilities could have an effect at
the domain level. Detect Lie and Character Reading, for instance, could be
useful as might just about any of the other blood abilities. I`ve fiddled
around with using modifiers on domain actions from such blood abilities,
and it makes pretty good sense when one has an articulated system of domain
actions to combine them with effects from blood abilities.
> > I think part of the problem is that, whether or not there is a fair way to
> > balance scions vs. non-scions in terms of spell-or-feat-like blood
> > abilities, there just isn`t any fair way to balance *regents* vs.
> > non-regents
>
>There doesn`t need to be. Balance applies at the adventurer level.
>Balancing a regent versus an adventurer is like trying to balance the
>spellcasting of a wizard versus the spellcasting of a fighter- it just
>doesn`t apply. Luckily, all the proposals seem to attempt to do the right
>thing, which is to balance an adventuring scion with blood abilities
>versus an adventuring non-scion. They all agree with you here, so what
>is your complaint exactly?
I`ve argued in the past that having access to a domain is very similar to
having an inventory that contains gp value above and beyond that of a
"typical" character of the level of the character. Adventure level events
have less of an effect on the domain level (though I don`t think they are
entirely divorced as has been suggested) but domain level effects can
certainly have an effect at the adventure level. Regents engaging in
adventures can literally call upon armies. They can quickly circumvent the
local authorities--even call upon them to do as they are bid. Regents have
access to real estate, personnel, wealth, not to mention the reputation and
respect of the common citizenry. Normally an adventure contains aspects of
investigation or preparation that involve such people and regents have
access to things, or by their status a substantial advantage, that makes
those aspects of play at the adventure level easier. They can also call
upon experts and professionals to fight with, bring along siege equipment
or sailing ships. These things are significant and should be at least
noted by the DM when designing encounters and adventures.
Now none of that means a regent`s domain is worth an ECL because that
requires an XP expenditure for characters to level up, but it should be
factored in when determining EL and CR awards since those factors relate to
the difficulty of the encounter and the reward for that encounter. In
fact, if one were to go by the basis of the DMG an "average" encounter
would use up 25% of the character`s resources. A domain is a significant
resource. In the past, I`ve fiddled around with such numbers and found
that I could borrow a bit from the thinking of how to balance the EL of
characters with too much or too little equipment. Basically if one goes by
the chart of standard inventory gp values one can average the value of the
character`s inventory with his character level in order to get a number for
EL or CR awards. When it comes to a domain I`ve been fiddling around with
the assumption that 2 levels of a holding or province population level
equates to about 1 character level`s worth of equipment. That is a
character who controls a Law(4) in a province would have 2 character levels
worth of domain in his "inventory."
Gary
************************************************** **************************
The Birthright Homepage: http://www.birthright.net
Birthright-l Archives: http://oracle.wizards.com/archives/birthright-l.html
To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@ORACLE.WIZARDS.COM
with UNSUB BIRTHRIGHT-L in the body of the message.
-
06-10-2003, 10:09 PM #33
----- Original Message -----
From: "irdeggman" <brnetboard@BIRTHRIGHT.NET>
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 2:45 PM
> I think this is were you`ve confused me with the reference to suggestions
> that being a ruler should come from aging has me confused. I don`t
believe
> that I`ve seen a proposal that being a ruler comes with aging (not
directly
> at least). I`m assuming that this was in relation to the scion class
levels
> discussions.
Aging doesn`t cause rulership, its a consequence of it. Looking at real
life executives of historical countries, many experience crises that seem to
age them. This was a tossed off aside, I`m not going to work up mechanics
for actually aging characters because they are rulers, I`m suggesting that
the job in itself is really hard, look at how these historical guys were
spent by the challenges of their rule.
Kenneth Gauck
kgauck@mchsi.com
************************************************** **************************
The Birthright Homepage: http://www.birthright.net
Birthright-l Archives: http://oracle.wizards.com/archives/birthright-l.html
To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@ORACLE.WIZARDS.COM
with UNSUB BIRTHRIGHT-L in the body of the message.
-
06-10-2003, 11:29 PM #34
At 11:03 PM 6/9/2003 -0500, Kenneth Gauck wrote:
> > It`s kind of like the word "genius" which I`ve always considered a
> > verb, but most people think is a noun.) I suspect it`s just a descriptor
> > some people put on the combination of success and recognition in
> > order to attempt to quantify something that is in many ways random
> > or the result of cunning marketing. Many people are just as talented
> > and capable as those that are lauded as "truly great" or whatever, but
> > are overlooked for reasons having little to do with their work or
> > productivity.
>
>For the purposes of fantasy gaming, I am willing to follow the lead of those
>medieval admirers, the Romantics, who had very clear ideas about what genius
>was and whose ideas greatly influence the current age. So the kinds of
>things you see in the works of Shelley, Wordsworth, Keats, and Coleridge
>about what constitutes genius, the heroic figure who struggles against
>impossible odds, who understands things on a level unknown to common men.
>This both suits the heroic tone of fantasy gaming (especially in BR) and is
>quite compatable with our sources of the mediaval world in literature.
>
>While I do not generally take Romanticism seriously, and certainly not in
>historical analysis, the genius in history is a Hegalian construction in
>which the hero in history is the one who advances the inevitable cause,
>Napoleon being the archtypical example, both for Hegal and for those who
>employed his ideas of heroicism in history. One would like to think that
>figures like Hitler and Stalin would have purged the idea of the hero in
>history, but alas, it is not so.
>
>In fantasy gaming, I`m willing to indulge in the most heroic notions of
>character, whether Romantic or Homeric.
Well, we`re somewhat off topic here, but I`d like to scribble a few lines
on this subject so I will. I`ll try to bring it back into some sort of BR
relevance just so we have some sort of payoff for those who get that far....
I do take Romanticism seriously, and would note that one really should
throw Byron in there amongst the list of them since any roll call of the
Romantics that doesn`t include him seems lacking somehow.
However, in the case of the word "genius" I tend to harken back further
than the 18th or 19th centuries to the origins of the word. The genesis of
the word genius (if I can use that term without being too linguistically
incestuous--genius and genesis have the same linguistic roots) is from the
Greek concept of a personal tutelary deity. In many societies everything
is attributed a spirit force. There are river gods, mountain gods, and
along with them gods for every tributary and stream, hill and
stone. Likewise, everyone has a personal god that grants knowledge and
inspires creativity, and it is getting in touch with this genius that is
amongst the highest of human activities. Think back to a time when you`ve
been particularly creative or inspired. You know how it feels as if
whatever it was you were creating didn`t really originate with you? That
it somehow was implanted in your mind? That is your genius at work. It is
the force that connected one to the divine capacity for learning and
creation that seems outside the self. So if I can risk a bit more
linguistic incest the genus of a person is the self, while the species of
that person is his genius. A human is that person (genus) who gets in
touch with his genius (species.)
In modern parlance, of course, genius is used to describe someone who has a
particular talent or is generally talented. "Bob is a genius." To me,
however, that`s a misuse of the term. Genius is that force outside the
self that inspires Bob and allows him to perform certain things with
extraordinary, almost effortless grace, ability and aplomb. His skill
seems magical. He seems touched by a divine, omnipotence that guides his
movements and allows him to do things beyond the capabilities of
humans. The concept of genius is that all that is true. It`s NOT Bob at
work. It IS his genius gifting him with those abilities. Some people are
more able to get in touch with their genius than others, but on the whole
when someone does something that other people find extraordinary or
inexplicable that`s their genius. When someone says "Bob is a genius" what
that means to me is that "Bob is in touch with his genius" or "Bob`s genius
is communicating with him." It`s an action, not a descriptive noun.
Now, just for the sake of clarifying my take on this sort of thing and
making sure everyone out there doesn`t think I`m an animist freak out
trying to promote some flaky pagan agenda--I don`t think there`s a personal
god of creativity. "Genius" is the term the ancient Greeks in their
spiritist worldview put on the process of getting in touch with our own
deep seated intellectual capacity. Our brains have vast, untapped
resources, most of which are buzzing along in our subconscious minds
24/7. An external genius does not exist any more than the Tooth
Fairy. The process of getting in touch with our subconscious, however,
very definitely does exist and that`s what I`m getting at here.
When it comes to the Romantics, I`d definitely borrow from them their take
on the heroic figure, their rather rosy view of the medieval period and
their rather view of life as high drama, but I`d draw a distinction between
genius and those things, and would suggest that in many cases the term
genius was for them the same as that of the Greeks rather than an actual
person.
What`s all this got to do with anything Birthright related? Well, here it
is: Genius = bloodline. What better analogy for a personal deity do we
need than a bit of divine power actually connecting a character to the gods?
In gaming terms one could embody this in many ways. The one that strikes
me as being the most useful is some fairly recent discussion about the use
of action points. Action points are used in certain settings/systems to
allow characters to perform extraordinarily well on particular rolls or to
access extraordinary powers. Generally, they allow a player to roll an
additional d6 on any d20 check, or to activate a power that has magical
effects. In BR one could give characters action points to spend--scions
could get bonus action points based upon their bloodline strength or
score. The recent discussion (actually it`s a perennial discussion) on how
to handle bloodline in 3e/d20 could include such a factor as the basis for
determining ECL since bloodline itself seems to be so difficult to
quantify. If it grants action points then it`s easier to put a point value
on it. Similarly, regents might spend RP in order to gain Action Points
(the exchange rate might be 1:2 or higher) and thus effects of the domain
upon EL and CR might similarly be quantified.
Gary
************************************************** **************************
The Birthright Homepage: http://www.birthright.net
Birthright-l Archives: http://oracle.wizards.com/archives/birthright-l.html
To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@ORACLE.WIZARDS.COM
with UNSUB BIRTHRIGHT-L in the body of the message.
-
06-11-2003, 07:55 AM #35
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Location
- BR mailing list
- Posts
- 1,538
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
I`m sorry about not submitting a proposeal. I had
origivally intended to make an official propoposal out
of my ideas - but I`ve simply not had the time and
inclination. Since my Birthright camaign is now
basically finished, and I don`t really expect to go
back to the setting in a while, my focus now lies
elsewhere.
If many people think it would be worthwhile, I could
make a full proposal out of my ideas - though it would
be very late. [My! Was that ever a blatant plug!]
I`ll try to give another summing-up of my 1 1/2 year
campaign, that ended with the death and (probaly -
there is still a chance to stop it) deification of the
Gorgon, after it is wholy finished - which I think
will be tonight.
The last session may involve a momentous lie told by a
paladin of Avanale (godess of truth) or the fall of
the empire just as it is about to rise from the ashes
- a tough choice to make! The question: "Did you kill
the Gorgon?" Full, true answer: "Yes. He allowed me to
do so as a part of his personal deification plan and
in order to make room for his son to re-create the
empire".
> irdeggman wrote:
>
> Their info wasn`t included because no one sent me
> anything to include. I had asked repeatedly for
> proposals so that I could put them together in one
> document for ease of comparison, but only Shade,
> Gary, Mark V and Mark_Aurel bothered to send me
> anything.:)
>
>
> Originally posted by ryancaveney[/i]
>
>> I think my personal choice for the method I`ll be
>> using IMC is a
>> combination of things Kenneth and Starfox have said
>> which aren`t in "the
>> proposals
__________________________________________________ ___
Gå före i kön och få din sajt värderad på nolltid med Yahoo! Express
Se mer på: http://se.docs.yahoo.com/info/express/help/index.html
************************************************** **************************
The Birthright Homepage: http://www.birthright.net
Birthright-l Archives: http://oracle.wizards.com/archives/birthright-l.html
To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@ORACLE.WIZARDS.COM
with UNSUB BIRTHRIGHT-L in the body of the message.NOTE: Messages posted by Birthright-L are automatically inserted posts originating from the mailing list linked to the forum.
-
06-11-2003, 09:08 AM #36
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
- Location
- Virginia Beach, Virginia
- Posts
- 3,945
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
Originally posted by kgauck
----- Original Message -----
From: "irdeggman" <brnetboard@BIRTHRIGHT.NET>
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 2:45 PM
> I think this is were you`ve confused me with the reference to suggestions
> that being a ruler should come from aging has me confused. I don`t
believe
> that I`ve seen a proposal that being a ruler comes with aging (not
directly
> at least). I`m assuming that this was in relation to the scion class
levels
> discussions.
Aging doesn`t cause rulership, its a consequence of it. Looking at real
life executives of historical countries, many experience crises that seem to
age them. This was a tossed off aside, I`m not going to work up mechanics
for actually aging characters because they are rulers, I`m suggesting that
the job in itself is really hard, look at how these historical guys were
spent by the challenges of their rule.
Kenneth Gauck
kgauck@mchsi.com
Duane Eggert
-
06-11-2003, 10:09 AM #37
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
- Location
- Virginia Beach, Virginia
- Posts
- 3,945
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
Originally posted by Birthright-L
I`m sorry about not submitting a proposeal. I had
origivally intended to make an official propoposal out
of my ideas - but I`ve simply not had the time and
inclination. Since my Birthright camaign is now
basically finished, and I don`t really expect to go
back to the setting in a while, my focus now lies
elsewhere.
If many people think it would be worthwhile, I could
make a full proposal out of my ideas - though it would
be very late. [My! Was that ever a blatant plug!]
My e-mail, again, is irdeggman@cox.netDuane Eggert
-
06-11-2003, 04:15 PM #38
- Join Date
- Dec 2002
- Location
- Malden, MA
- Posts
- 761
- Downloads
- 2
- Uploads
- 0
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Carl Cramér wrote:
> If many people think it would be worthwhile, I could
> make a full proposal out of my ideas - though it would
> be very late. [My! Was that ever a blatant plug!]
Yes! Gimme gimme. =)
Ryan Caveney
************************************************** **************************
The Birthright Homepage: http://www.birthright.net
Birthright-l Archives: http://oracle.wizards.com/archives/birthright-l.html
To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@ORACLE.WIZARDS.COM
with UNSUB BIRTHRIGHT-L in the body of the message.
-
06-18-2003, 08:28 AM #39
- Join Date
- Jul 2002
- Posts
- 79
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
I am back all. :)
I really like the B. one. It can be balanced and they must sacrafice exp to gain power.
The only people who don't want it to be balanced with everything else are power gamers hiding as roleplayers.
-
06-20-2003, 11:03 PM #40
- Join Date
- May 2002
- Location
- Glasgow, Scotland
- Posts
- 120
- Downloads
- 10
- Uploads
- 0
Actually, what were the final numbers for or against the blood stat? The only poll I found had more for than against, but as you seem to be going ahead with scrapping the blood-stat (the original treatment of it anyway), I'm assuming there was another poll, yes?
CM.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks