Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13
  1. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    BR mailing list
    Posts
    1,538
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Gauthier wrote:
    > There`s just one thing i`m not totaly agree with. It`s when
    > ryancaveney says "the population (100.000) is already there".
    > Well, I can rather imagine that in a coastal plain in temperate
    > region, but even in that region it will be a rate of more than 30
    > people by Km². It`s a little bit to many people, don`t you think
    > so? In desertic or arctic region it`s for me totally impossible.

    Medieval demographics made easy: the best page ever.
    http://www.io.com/~sjohn/demog.htm

    Average population density: 30/square mile for poor terrain, up to 120 for
    fertile areas.

    A BR province is like 35 by 35 miles on average. That`s 1225 square
    miles.

    For a plains province, max 100,000 people, that`s a population density of
    81/mile^2. Not too high, in fact I`d say fertile plains provinces should
    have a higher limit.

    Your other objection, that the number is way too high for deserts, is
    easily answered, because only plains have a limit of population 10. Other
    terrain types are lower, which I`m sure is what Ryan meant, he was just
    using plains as an example.

    For poor terrain, 30/mile^2 gives us a population of 36750, which is about
    a province level 6.
    --
    Communication is possible only between equals.
    Daniel McSorley- mcsorley@cis.ohio-state.edu

    ************************************************** **************************
    The Birthright Homepage: http://www.birthright.net
    Birthright-l Archives: http://oracle.wizards.com/archives/birthright-l.html
    To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@ORACLE.WIZARDS.COM
    with UNSUB BIRTHRIGHT-L in the body of the message.
    NOTE: Messages posted by Birthright-L are automatically inserted posts originating from the mailing list linked to the forum.

  2. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Malden, MA
    Posts
    761
    Downloads
    2
    Uploads
    0
    On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, daniel mcsorley wrote:

    > Your other objection, that the number is way too high for deserts, is
    > easily answered, because only plains have a limit of population 10.
    > Other terrain types are lower, which I`m sure is what Ryan meant, he
    > was just using plains as an example.

    Precisely. To treat Gauthier`s concerns (desert and arctic) directly:
    maximum province level in the desert is 3, or 9,000 people (3 per square
    kilometer); maximum tundra level is 2, or 4,000 people (1 per km^2); and
    the glacier limit is only 1, or just 1,000 people (.3/km^2).


    Ryan Caveney

    ************************************************** **************************
    The Birthright Homepage: http://www.birthright.net
    Birthright-l Archives: http://oracle.wizards.com/archives/birthright-l.html
    To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@ORACLE.WIZARDS.COM
    with UNSUB BIRTHRIGHT-L in the body of the message.

  3. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Malden, MA
    Posts
    761
    Downloads
    2
    Uploads
    0
    On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Gauthier wrote:

    > You will say it`s very quick, yes, but I think that my center view are
    > my players, and it`s at their advantage, as far as it`s a little one.

    Yes, it`s very quick. Too quick for me to believe, but still not fast
    enough to be of much use. As you note, real population growth rates are
    so small that if we link province level directly to number of inhabitants,
    then almost no one ever gets to use a Rule Province action at all. Even
    using your method of unnaturally fast growth, it would still take 70
    domain turns to allow a province (1) to be ruled up to a province (2) --
    and even then there is nothing for the player to do, in that population
    growth just happens, and the number of turns in which a province will
    increase its level all on its own without any player action can be
    precisely calculated. Also, after just 58 years, every province (1) will
    have turned into a province (10) -- what, in your view, was the population
    of Cerilia at the time of Michael Roele? Deismaar?

    Since I too am concerned about keeping the game fun, busy and complicated
    for the players, I prefer to have an interpretation of the meaning of
    province level which lets me leave the use of Rule Province restricted no
    more than it is in the rulebook. I think my interpretation of province
    level preserves both gameplay and biological realism, while yours
    preserves neither -- I don`t think it solves the problem it`s meant to,
    and I think it introduces another one besides. I prefer to alter the
    meaning of the province level to population table, since I cannot see any
    reasonable way to keep both it and the Rule Province action unchanged.


    Ryan Caveney

    ************************************************** **************************
    The Birthright Homepage: http://www.birthright.net
    Birthright-l Archives: http://oracle.wizards.com/archives/birthright-l.html
    To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@ORACLE.WIZARDS.COM
    with UNSUB BIRTHRIGHT-L in the body of the message.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
BIRTHRIGHT, DUNGEONS & DRAGONS, D&D, the BIRTHRIGHT logo, and the D&D logo are trademarks owned by Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and are used by permission. ©2002-2010 Wizards of the Coast, Inc.