Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15
  1. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    144
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    I don't like this many princes idea. I think it was a bad idea to introduce this into SD. HOWEVER, I am glad, cos it causes a nice little mayhem, and as we all know, chaos is good :) Also, I am not involved in this dispute over titles, so it can only get more amusing for me to watch :)

  2. #12
    Site Moderator Magian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Thief River Falls, MN
    Posts
    497
    Downloads
    219
    Uploads
    19
    >From: Crossfell <brnetboard@TUARHIEVEL.ORG>
    >Apparently Grand Duke translates into `Grand Prince` in Russian.
    >Eventually this term became reserved for the Tsar`s descendents.
    >

    Tsar is the equivalent of Emperor later in the translation of the title
    decreed by the Tsar (of course).

    >Britannica lists `Herzog` as a German equivilant of `Duke`. I had
    >thought that herzog was equivilant to `baron` as ritter was to
    >`knight`. Appreciate any corrections on this.
    >

    Grossherzog is Archduke. The double (ss) in German is a funny symbol so you
    may see it published with it instead of the two (ss).


    >While I`m failing miserably to document it I had thought that Arch/Grand
    >Duke in English terms designated a Duke either superior to other dukes or
    >who had a very close tie to the royal bloodline.
    >

    I think the Grand Duke is tied both to a royal tie and an ruling autonomous
    Duke and the Archduke is specifically the title of Prince in the Hapsburg
    Austria.

    >But to return to the original article what do you think of the `Princes of
    >Anuire`? Waste of time or interesting objective in pursuit of the Iron
    >Throne?
    >
    >Cheers,
    >
    >Steve


    I think the whole structure of Anuirean title hierarchy is doomed to become
    moot. Title inflation will be used most likely in order to satisfy those
    regents who see to be emperor but cannot. So the title structure is not so
    very important in a post empire world except as they affect the direct
    government they are in. Princes I see more as the German princes either
    Royal rulers of principalities, royal tied nobles of principalities or royal
    dukes/grand dukes that have been granted regency of a principality. I am
    sure Richard Baker meant this to be more structure controlled though.

    ciao,


    Paul

    __________________________________________________ _______________
    Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
    http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail

    ************************************************** **************************
    The Birthright Homepage: http://www.birthright.net
    Birthright-l Archives: http://oracle.wizards.com/archives/birthright-l.html
    To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@ORACLE.WIZARDS.COM
    with UNSUB BIRTHRIGHT-L in the body of the message.
    One law, One court, One allied people, One coin, and one tax, is what I shall bring to Cerilia.

  3. #13
    Site Moderator Magian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Thief River Falls, MN
    Posts
    497
    Downloads
    219
    Uploads
    19
    >From: Crossfell <brnetboard@TUARHIEVEL.ORG>
    > Crossfell wrote:
    > Has anyone attempted to incorporate the `Princes of Anuire` into their
    >game? Or is this sentence so out of sync with all other published material
    >that it`s better off being ignored?
    >

    I think the vision Richard Baker may have had in mind was the original
    Empire included the 12 duchies and this has stood since they were
    incorporated into the empire. As a royal family is bound to have children
    and if the emperor is an expansionist it is probably useful to have these
    idle princes be regents over newly conquered lands. This is how I think the
    printed materials intened for the Princes to be. Thus a Prince may have
    ruled over provinces in Khinasi, perhaps a few princes to balance their
    bloodlines with the size of the principality and the same thing in Brechtur.
    When these regions gain independance they only affected the regent and
    royal family as the core 12 duchy empire was mostly unaffected and no trace
    of anuirean bloodlines remain except where they were absorbed into the
    current ruling class.

    ciao,

    Paul

    __________________________________________________ _______________
    Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
    http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

    ************************************************** **************************
    The Birthright Homepage: http://www.birthright.net
    Birthright-l Archives: http://oracle.wizards.com/archives/birthright-l.html
    To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@ORACLE.WIZARDS.COM
    with UNSUB BIRTHRIGHT-L in the body of the message.
    One law, One court, One allied people, One coin, and one tax, is what I shall bring to Cerilia.

  4. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Your House
    Posts
    201
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    According to my classes on medieval (and pre-medieval) history, a count was a title normally used to refer to a vassal ruler of a city, and was thus most common in Italy. Barons, and their equivalents, were more usually more common and would generally have more land; this wouldn't always equate to more power.

    Power, title, and fealty were very convoluted and difficult to discern. The Duke of Aquitaine was more powerful and had direct control over more land than the "King" of France for many generations, however, he was considered a vassal of the Capetian King. The Duke of Normandy became the King of France and theoretically had the vassalage of all of England, but was also theoretically subordinate to France.

    I don't like to second guess Richard Baker, but I believe that he may have intended the Anuirean Empire to be nearly as confusing as the real-life inspiration. Remember, almost all of Europe considered itself to be the rightful successor to (thus, synonymous with) the Roman Empire into the middle ages.

    I hope I've been informative.
    Explain how this is a signature, its not my handwriting.

    The hardest part was teaching the bunnies to hug. -Duke Phillips

  5. #15
    Site Moderator kgauck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Springfield Mo
    Posts
    3,562
    Downloads
    2
    Uploads
    0
    The thing that makes medieval European titles tricky is that the same basic
    set of titles means different things in different places. The meanings of
    the names also change over time. The title of count comes from the Roman
    titles "comes" which is an administrative office. In the context of urban
    Italy, that refers to seigniorial towns. In less urban places, like
    northern France, counts could be large landholders. The counts of
    Champagne, Poiters, Flanders, and Anjou had between the four of them about
    half of northern France.

    If you examine one area in the span of only a couple hundred years, the
    system actually seems pretty easy to understand and it begins to make a lot
    of sense.

    Kenneth Gauck
    kgauck@mchsi.com

    ************************************************** **************************
    The Birthright Homepage: http://www.birthright.net
    Birthright-l Archives: http://oracle.wizards.com/archives/birthright-l.html
    To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@ORACLE.WIZARDS.COM
    with UNSUB BIRTHRIGHT-L in the body of the message.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
BIRTHRIGHT, DUNGEONS & DRAGONS, D&D, the BIRTHRIGHT logo, and the D&D logo are trademarks owned by Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and are used by permission. ©2002-2010 Wizards of the Coast, Inc.