Azrai bloodline abilities: possible errata

[Sorontar]

There seems to be a discrepancy between what the BRCS 3.5e Chapter 2 and the BRCS wiki say is the possibilities of Blood abilities.


Yeah I tried to edit the errata but I guess I don't have permission for that page.
Here's what I tried to add:

Table 2-4b Minor Resistance (Azrai) should occur on a roll of 92-00, not 99-00.

I can't open the pdf form of BRCS 3.5e Chapter 2 (MacOS issue), but the Word docx version says that the error is actually in the Poison Sense row:

Word docx

89-98 –– –– Poison Sense
–– –– 78-80 Regeneration*
99-00 86-92 81-85 Resistance
–– –– 86-88 Shadow Form
–– –– 89-91 Touch of Decay
–– –– 92-98 Travel
–– 93-95 –– Unreadable Thoughts
–– 96-00 99-00 Wither Touch


Wiki doc

89-91 -- -- Poison Sense
-- -- 78-80 Regeneration *
99-00 86-92 81-85 Resistance
-- -- 86-88 Shadow Form
-- -- 89-91 Touch of Decay
-- -- 92-98 Travel
-- 93-95 -- Unreadable Thoughts
-- 96-00 99-00 Wither Touch

Can someone please tell me what the BRCS 3.5e pdf says for this table?

Sorontar
ps. Yes, the BRCS errata wiki page is protected from public editting so that we can make sure the errata are actually errors and discuss the corrections when needed.

[masterdaorin]

<same issue for me>

[Witness3]

This is from version 0.0 / Jan 30 2003 version, I hope it's the right version, if not, take it as reference.

1806

[Osprey]

This is from version 0.0 / Jan 30 2003 version, I hope it's the right version, if not, take it as reference.

1806

The Ch 2 pdf I have in my hard drive also agrees with this, which agrees with the Wiki page.


My Word doc also says the same as Sorontar's - which didn't have an error, but also makes Poison Sense a 10% chance while minor resistance is only 3%.

Hmmm...

Well...from a player's perspective I can say I'd far rather have Poison Sense then Necromancy resistance (+4 to saves) as a widely useful ability.

However, the Book of Regency - our only core reference for a table soley for Minor Azrai Bloodline Abilities, has
89–91 Poison Sense
92–98 Resistance

My original correction would be more in line with the BoR.